Original post answer from here - COST.


________________________________
 From: Ken Javor <[email protected]>
To: [email protected] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 6, 2011 5:11 PM
Subject: Re: [PSES] Calibration practice for EMI test transducers
 

Re: [PSES] Calibration practice for EMI test transducers 
This discussion has gone far a field from the original post.  I’m assuming some 
sort of scan has been run and a continuous sweep is available. The question is, 
how densely does that sweep need to be digitized? Not as a practical matter, 
but as a matter of compliance with standards or standard practice.

What manner of antenna would have performance as cited below where at 100 MHz 
the antenna factor is 10 dB and at 120 MHz it is 12 dB, but at 110 MHz it could 
be 20 dB? Let’s generalize the question to any closely spaced frequencies.

Let’s look at the types of antennas available.

30-200 MHz: A half-wave tuned dipole is nowhere near that sharp.  Neither is a 
biconical.

200 – 1000 MHz:  A half-wave tuned dipole is nowhere near that sharp.  Neither 
is a logperiodic, log-spiral, nor a Yagi.

1 GHz+:  Logperiodic, log-spiral nor pyramidal horns act the way surmised.

My conclusion, and the point here is to invite discussion, not close it out, is 
that no test-type antenna is a high “Q” device.  Antennas can have arbitrarily 
high gains, depending on construction, but the high gain is a geometrical 
quality, not a high quality factor in the frequency domain. 
 
Ken Javor

Phone: (256) 650-5261


________________________________
From: <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 11:25:43 -0800
To: "ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen" <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PSES] Calibration practice for EMI test transducers


Yet how far would you take that argument?  If it's say 11.1db at 110MHz and 
11.5dB at 112MHz, would you still worry about 
factor at 111MHz?  At some point surly this all becomes rather silly.
_____________________________________________________________________________________

Ralph McDiarmid |  Schneider Electric  |  Renewable Energies Business |   
CANADA  |   Regulatory Compliance Engineering



From:"ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen" <[email protected]>
To:[email protected]
Date:12/05/2011 10:06 PM
Subject:Re: [PSES] Calibration practice for EMI test transducers
________________________________



If at 100 MHz your sensor indicates during calibration 10 dB
and at 120 MHz 12 dB, how are you going to know the value at
110 MHz. It maight be 20 as well as 0 dB, you don't not know as you did
not measure/ calibrate. 
This requires some knowledge about the behavior of the sensor,
and the 1/BW is and indication of that.
There is another aspect in EMI measurements.

As the measuring receiver interpolates
between the calibrated samples, the max interpolation error
(lin interpolation) is 50% of the vertical differences between
calibration points.

If the measuring receiver is +/- 0.5 dB you should register a
calibration
 each time the difference between previous and current sample is 0.5 dB.
Then the total error will be slightly more than 0.5 dB.
There are more sophisticated interpolation methods such as 
cubic spline and polynomial  interpolation, and the error item
is subject to higher mathematics.....
Play with it at:

http://terpconnect.umd.edu/~petersd/interp.html<http://terpconnect.umd.edu/~petersd/interp.html>
 

or at 
http://www.ibiblio.org/e-notes/Splines/Lagrange.htm<http://www.ibiblio.org/e-notes/Splines/Lagrange.htm>
 

you can actually move the points on the latter page.

Gert Gremmen


-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> ] 
Namens Cortland
Richmond
Verzonden: dinsdag 6 december 2011 3:01
Aan: [email protected]
Onderwerp: RE: Calibration practice for EMI test transducers

I recently had occasion to verify on an 8591EM generic factors for an 
EMCO current clamp during pretest, and used its tracking generator to 
see if with a short wire the result was a straight line on the screen. 
That simply called for paying attention to 1/BW.


Cortland
KA5S

On 12/5/2011 5:33 PM, Ken Javor wrote:
If an antenna, current probe or other transducer is going to be
calibrated
over its frequency range of operation, what determines the step sizes
between measured frequencies, or if swept, what determines the density
of
test points reported?

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your
e-mail to <[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html<http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html> 

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site
at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/<http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/> 
can be used for graphics (in
well-used formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/<http://www.ieee-pses.org/> 
Instructions:  
http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html<http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html>
 
List rules: 
http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html<http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html>
 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html<http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html> 

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/<http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/> 
can be used for graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/<http://www.ieee-pses.org/> 
Instructions:  
http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html<http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html>
 
List rules: 
http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html<http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html>
 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
______________________________________________________________________


-
----------------------------------------------------------------

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:      http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules:     http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher  <[email protected]>
David Heald <[email protected]> 

 
-
----------------------------------------------------------------

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]>
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> 
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher  <[email protected]>
David Heald <[email protected]>

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

Reply via email to