In message <[email protected]>,
dated Fri, 23 Dec 2011, Bill Owsley <[email protected]> writes:
For example, 3m FAC to 3m OATS might be as much as 6 dB higher
neglecting all the previous mentioned reasons why it cannot be that much
A single reflection can get very close to the simplified theoretical 6
dB (simplified by assuming that half a wavelength is very small compared
with the separation between source and receiver, so that the extra path
loss of the reflected wave is minimal) but not reach it. But there may
well be more than one reflection.
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK
Some people who are peeling the finch of the financial crisis are thinking of
biting a rook.
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]>
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used
formats), large files, etc.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher: <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>
