Jim

As others have suggested, I'd recommend leaving you chamber as it is, HOWEVER, 
I would perform correlation to OATS using some of your typical EUT, as well as 
a CNE or other noisy "box" - I've seen >10dB difference, relative to limit, 
between 3m FAC's and 10m OATS measurement when measuring an EUT that had a 
cable that dropped down to ground plane.

Regards
Charlie

From: Jim Hulbert [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: 16 December 2011 21:49
To: [email protected]
Subject: [PSES] Semi-Anechoic Chamber Question

I have an older 3-meter semi-anechoic chamber that is fully compliant for 
radiated immunity testing per IEC 61000-4-3.  Occasionally I also use the 
chamber to run a radiated emissions "pre-scan".  When I use the chamber for the 
pre-scan up to 1 GHz, I remove the foam absorbers and ferrite floor tiles 
between the antenna and EUT to get a reflecting ground plane.  The aborbers are 
no problem but the floor tiles are quite heavy.  As an easier option,  I'm 
thinking of coming up with a relatively light weight conductive surface that 
can be easily placed over the floor tiles and easily removed again.  Something 
like a foil that could be rolled into place and then rolled up again when done. 
 I could connect the foil to the shielded room floor to ground it.  Does anyone 
have any experience doing something like this or would I be wasting my time and 
better off continuing my practice of removing the tiles?  I'm not looking for 
compliance emissions measurements because I'm limited to 3 meter distance and 
an antenna sweep height of 3 meters.  However, I would like to get the best 
pre-scan data I can to minimize surprises when I do go out to an open area test 
site for the final test.

Thanks.

Jim Hulbert
-
----------------------------------------------------------------

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
David Heald <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

Reply via email to