Hi John:
 
Unless I've totally misunderstand things, UL is a commercial company, and is
only one of several (many?) competing companies able to provide
certification services, albeit the largest of them. How can it be valid law
in any state to give a private company a monopoly position in the provision
of such a wide-ranging service? How does it get on the statute book? Why
don't other labs create a fuss?

 
At one time, UL actively pursued such regulations that 
excluded other certification houses.  I sat in on 
several Oregon Electrical Board meetings when UL gave 
their pitch.  In Oregon, UL sold themselves to the
exclusion of ALL other certification houses.  Suddenly, 
Oregon found that gas furnaces, traditionally certified 
by the AGA, could not be installed because they were not
certified by UL!  That was quite an embarrassment for
both the Electrical Board and UL.  
 
If UL couldn't be overtly named as in Georgia, UL pitched
for monthly follow-up services, which most other cert
houses couldn't match.  And other similar ploys.  
 
 
Best regards,
Rich
 
 
 
 

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of John Cotman
Sent: Monday, January 09, 2012 2:17 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [PSES] Mandatory NRTL certification



As a European familiar with the CE marking system and the resultant free
market for goods across more than 30 countries, this debate has left me
utterly amazed! 

Just plucking this bit for Georgia out of the survey document:

 

"GEORGIA

Ga. Comp. R. & Regs. r. 300-5-14-.02 (2007)

All electrical wire, apparatus, and equipment in temporary or permanent use
shall be, where applicable, of a

type approved by and bearing the Underwriters Laboratories label."

 

Unless I've totally misunderstand things, UL is  a commercial company, and
is only one of several (many?) competing companies able to provide
certification services, albeit the largest of them.  How can it be valid law
in any state to give a private company a monopoly position in the provision
of such a wide-ranging service?  How does it get on the statute book?  Why
don't other labs create a fuss?

 

John C

 

 




-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

Reply via email to