In message
<e9c52f9e77c43c49a56a22691b3680be22e...@tk5ex14mbxc301.redmond.corp.micro
soft.com>, dated Wed, 11 Jan 2012, Ted Eckert <[email protected]>
writes:
Unfortunately, UL talks in terms of percentages for temperatures. I
always hate when UL does this, but I believe that their intention is to
indicate percentage in terms of the temperature in degrees Celsius.
Not only that, "(no more than a 1- percent net increase between the last
two readings)" implies you have to measure to 1 part in 1000 to have
confidence in your 1%. So I'll assume they mean degrees Rankine, because
then 1 part in 1000 is a realistic 0.5 degree. (;-)
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK
Some people who are peeling the finch of the financial crisis are thinking of
biting a rook.
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]>
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used
formats), large files, etc.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher: <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>
