They really should be asking for X successive readings spaced no more than 
Y minutes apart showing no further change in temperature.  (it might show 
steady state or a small oscillation between readings)  I've always used a 
precision (not accuracy) of 0.5 deg C for determining a trend.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
 


Ralph McDiarmid  |   Schneider Electric   |  Renewable Energies Business | 
  CANADA  |   Regulatory Compliance Engineering 




From:
John Woodgate <[email protected]>
To:
[email protected]
Date:
01/11/2012 07:45 AM
Subject:
Re: [PSES] Steady State Conditions



In message 
<e9c52f9e77c43c49a56a22691b3680be22e...@tk5ex14mbxc301.redmond.corp.micro
soft.com>, dated Wed, 11 Jan 2012, Ted Eckert <[email protected]> 
writes:

>Unfortunately, UL talks in terms of percentages for temperatures. I 
>always hate when UL does this, but I believe that their intention is to 
>indicate percentage in terms of the temperature in degrees Celsius.

Not only that, "(no more than a 1- percent net increase between the last 
two readings)" implies you have to measure to 1 part in 1000 to have 
confidence in your 1%. So I'll assume they mean degrees Rankine, because 
then 1 part in 1000 is a realistic 0.5 degree. (;-)
-- 
OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK
Some people who are peeling the finch of the financial crisis are thinking 
of
biting a rook.

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in 
well-used formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
______________________________________________________________________



-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

Reply via email to