Do you only want to determine Field Uniformity or do you also want to determine the power you need for testing?
If you use the constant power method, it works good to determine uniformity but I feel the data collected is not the best for determining test power. Using the Constant Field Strength method and storing all the data, you can determine field uniformity and better determine your test power in one test which can save time. The only thing is you have to know you have a good setup and enough power to perform the test with your amps operating well within their linear range (no clipping). The Other Brian -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of WNya Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 4:36 AM To: EMC-PSTC Subject: IEC 61000-4-3 Field Uniformity Measurement Dear Experts, Two methods are mentioned in the standard - constant power calibration and constant field strength calibration. Is there a preferred method (benefits?) of one over the other? If yes, why? What would be the considerations to use constant field strength instead of constant power? Is it related to the equipment setup? Our system integrator recommended constant power method because he is, as he claimed, more familiar with it. Although both achieved the same purpose, what are the engineering differences between them? Sent from Wendy.Nya iPhone - ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <[email protected]> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <[email protected]> David Heald: <[email protected]> ________________________________ LECO Corporation Notice: This communication may contain confidential information intended for the named recipient(s) only. If you received this by mistake, please destroy it and notify us of the error. Thank you. - ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <[email protected]> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <[email protected]> David Heald: <[email protected]>
