A change was made in 3rd Ed. for routine mains hipot tests while clamping
devices are still in the circuit; specifically clause F.3.2 (Ed. 3).

The standard states the test can be carried out at 0.9 times the
clamping voltage of the device and "not less than twice the working
voltage."  Edition 2 said "not less than that of the working voltage."

My application is 230Vac and I initially selected 275Vrms MOVs.
 Plugging in the F.3.2 equations, I get a hipot failure.

These devices have a very soft voltage knee and as a result of the dynamic
resistance, the knee very time dependent.  The MOV supplier states the
"maximum" clamping voltage using the 8/20 mS surge  is 710V and the DC
clamping voltage with a 1 mA current source is 473V.  I would assume the
473V is very similar to the peak of the 275 Vrms 50/60 Hz waveform, plus
some headroom for component tolerance (~18%).

If you try running the numbers to re-select a different MOV value, it is
very possible to get all tied up in knots.  So, which "clamping voltage"
are we to use?  My thought is to use 2 x 230 = 460V and select the next
higher MOV from the catalog.

Opinions, rulings, decrees from on high?



-- 
Thanks, -doug

Douglas E Powell
[email protected]
http://www.linkedin.com/in/dougp01

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

Reply via email to