First off, a belated thank you to the folks that helped with a confusing
requirement on buzzer loudness.
Now I have a new confusing thing :-) Despite reading numerous papers,
presentations, and the official notice, I am still confused about how it
affects designs.
Here is what I get:
-- all new designs (introduced to the market now) need RoHS II compliance for
CE marking
---- the substance list for RoHS II is the same as RoHS I (for now)
---- the documentation for the design elements with regards to RoHS II
substances needs to be more complete
---- this documentation is part of a technical file
---- there needs to be a risk assessment in regards to whether the
manufacturers that you get components from are compliant
-- existing designs which were subject to RoHS I can continue to ship without
the additional RoHS II documentation requirements, and can still be CE marked
-- existing designs which were exempt from RoHS I have a period of time that
they can continue to ship before becoming compliant.
What are the glaring holes in my summary?
Curt
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected]>
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used
formats), large files, etc.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher: <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>
