In message <[email protected]>, dated Fri, 29
Mar 2013, Carl Newton <[email protected]> writes:
It appears that John Tyra was explaining that 60065 and 60950 have
their own requirements specific to headphones and that they reference
the 50332 standards to be used as the test methods. If that's the case
then I believe that the scope of the method (50332) is irrelevant.
The situation is that 60065 and 60950-1 had to be written to be
consistent with the original, badly drafted versions of EN 55032-1 and
-2. The committee realised that those standards needed urgent revision,
which is now in process, When the new editions are available, EN 60065,
EN 60950-1 (if they still exist) and EN 62389-1 will be aligned.
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. See www.jmwa.demon.co.uk
Which Thunderbird will David Miliband pilot? Or will he drive Lady Penelope?
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]>
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used
formats), large files, etc.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher: <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>
