Rich, Thanks for your comments!
Regards, Scott On 2/8/13 3:03 AM, "Richard Nute" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi Scott: > > > Scott: If the possibility is so small, is it worthwhile to recall the > products that one insulation deteriorates? Stopping sale is a must. > > If one insulation deteriorates or fails, then one may not know > when the next insulation fails. So it is necessary to recall. > > Scott: Those professionals, design and test people are relying on the symbol > to determine the safety protection class? > > No. They are either designing or testing the double insulation > system. The symbol is to distinguish between Class II and > Class 0 whose construction appears the same on the outside of > the equipment. Class I needs no symbol. (There is a symbol > for Class III but it is not required.) > > > Best regards, > Rich > > > - ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <[email protected]> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <[email protected]> David Heald: <[email protected]>
