In message
<20130930182145.2fbc841068a20b9c2f20986d48de9122.8fa96c0d5f.wbe@email02.s
ecureserver.net>, dated Mon, 30 Sep 2013, [email protected] writes:
I think this is a wake up call for manufacturers to be more diligent in
even minute details like the markings.
I agree with all your points. Checking documents and markings is quick
and needs only minimum training for inspectors: finding important
problems requires much more skill, time and money.
I have to say that when I do safety assessments, errors in documents,
especially wrong or irrelevant standards cited in the DoC, or wrong or
absent markings do make me suspect that I'll find technical issues as
well.
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. With best wishes. See www.jmwa.demon.co.uk
If dictionaries were correct, we would only need one, because they would all
give the same information.
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]>
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used
formats), large files, etc.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher: <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>
