The U.S. Department of Energy has definitely not abandoned EPS efficiency 
requirements. The final rule was published on February 10 and comes into effect 
in two years.
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2014-02-10/pdf/2014-02560.pdf

It is possible that the new DoE levels will be adopted as EnergyStar level VI.

Ted Eckert
Compliance Engineer
Microsoft Corporation
[email protected]

The opinions expressed are my own and do not necessarily reflect those of my 
employer.
-----Original Message-----
From: Martin E. Cormier [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2014 8:54 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PSES] CEC will establish fines for energy efficiency violoations

Hi Brian,

May I ask where you got the feeling the DoE was abandoning EPS efficiency 
requirements?  This news item kind of tells the opposite.
http://www.energy.gov/articles/new-energy-efficiency-standards-external-power-supplies-cut-consumers-utility-bills

Unless I'm reading it wrong...

Martin


On 2014-02-13 7:14 PM, Brian Oconnell wrote:
> <www.energy.ca.gov/appliances/enforcement/notices/2014-02-25_Notice_of
> _Staff_Workshop.pdf>
>
> Also, it seems that the U.S. Dept of Energy has abandoned charger and EPS 
> efficiency requirements, so am guessing that most Americano states will adopt 
> the CEC stuff (California Title 20, sections 160x).
>
> Brian
>
> -
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society 
> emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your 
> e-mail to <[email protected]>
>
> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
> http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
>
> Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
> http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
> formats), large files, etc.
>
> Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
> Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to 
> unsubscribe) List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
>
> For help, send mail to the list administrators:
> Scott Douglas <[email protected]> Mike Cantwell 
> <[email protected]>
>
> For policy questions, send mail to:
> Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
> David Heald: <[email protected]>
>

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to 
unsubscribe) List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

Reply via email to