Gary -- 

The basis of the law is that one should not expose citizens of California to 
any of these chemicals "known to the State of..." without first warning them. 
No requirement to remove them. Appears to be a "name and shame" approach that 
has had some success in companies removing some chemicals from products. 

A few points: 
1. A huge portion of the 800+ chemicals have no established safe harbor levels. 
2. Enforcement is primarily by citizens or NGO type groups who buy products 
without warnings, test them to find any of the 800+ chemicals, then work with 
specialty law firms to sue you and reach what are in effect consent settlements 
that cover all of their attorneys' fees and then some. This enforcement 
mechanism is written into the law/regulations, and appears painful for those 
sued. 
3. California is in the process of "improving" the enforcing regulations, and 
issued proposals in April 2014. They got a lot of comments, and are presumably 
digesting those on their way to final regulations. I did not see these 
proposals as improvements, which is why I put the quotation marks around the 
word. 
4. Because of the size of the California market plus the common desire by 
manufacturers for one set of warnings for all products sold in the USA, this 
has impacts far outside of California. 

Contact me separately if you'd like to chat about this. 

Mike Sherman 
Graco Inc. 

----- Original Message -----

From: "Gary McInturff" <[email protected]> 
To: "EMC-PSTC" <[email protected]> 
Sent: Thursday, October 2, 2014 10:06:14 AM 
Subject: [PSES] California Prop 65 



Just starting to dig into this – and haven’t gotten to the legalese just yet 
but headed that way. But so far what I’ve read would indicate that it doesn’t 
mandate removal of the chemicals – other than those already regulated such as 
lead a Cadmium it appears that after analysis is you are above the below the 
safe harbor numbers you are only required to put a warning on the product that 
carcinogenic materials are in the product. I’ve seen the warnings all over the 
place during my travels to California – Disneyland, and basically any place you 
can think of. I believe they have a contact point so the interested consumer 
could follow up should they choose, but certainly a warning can’t be all that 
is required for the 800 or so chemicals listed. Is there no requirement for 
removal or reduction to the safe harbor levels? 

Thanks 



Gary McInturff 

Reliability/Compliance Engineer 







Esterline Interface Technologies        

Featuring 

ADVANCED INPUT, GAMESMAN, 

and LRE MEDICAL products 


600 W. Wilbur Avenue 

Coeur d’Alene, ID 83815-9496 

Toll Free: 800-444-5923 X1XXX 

Tel: (208) 635-8 

Fax: (208) 635-8 



www.esterline.com/interfacetechnologies 



Technology, Innovation, Performance… 



"Information in or attached to this e-mail message may be subject to export 
control restrictions of the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) 
(22 CFR pts. 120-130) or the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) (15 CFR 
pts. 730-774). Before exporting this information outside the United States or 
releasing it to a foreign person in the United States, you need to determine 
whether a license under the EAR or the ITAR is required to do so. If you have 
any questions about this obligation, please contact me." 






- 
---------------------------------------------------------------- 


This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to &LT; 
[email protected] &GT; 

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html 

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc. 

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ 
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe) 
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators: 
Scott Douglas &LT; [email protected] &GT; 
Mike Cantwell &LT; [email protected] &GT; 

For policy questions, send mail to: 
Jim Bacher &LT; [email protected] &GT; 
David Heald &LT; [email protected] &GT; 


-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

Reply via email to