In message
<trinity-8c6816f3-df1d-4c5f-b2c0-41691b856a66-1414594781031@3capp-mailcom
-lxa05>, dated Wed, 29 Oct 2014, Anthony Thomson <[email protected]>
writes:
So why can't you claim compliance to the RED (assuming you do)? To coin
a phrase... "there's no law against it". Or is there
False advertising? The point is that since RED isn't a law and there is
no law derived from it until one member state makes one, claiming
compliance with it is of no meaning. You might as well claim compliance
with Magna Carta.
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. With best wishes. See www.jmwa.demon.co.uk
Quid faciamus nisi sit?
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]>
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used
formats), large files, etc.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher: <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>
