Tony

Some definitive statement regarding  implementation of Directives” is at 
http://ec.europa.eu/eu_law/directives/directives_en.htm

What is a directive?
EU directives lay down certain end results that must be achieved in every 
Member State. National authorities have to adapt their laws to meet these 
goals, but are free to decide how to do so. Directives may concern one or more 
EU countries, or all of them.
Each directive specifies the date by which the national laws must be adapted - 
giving national authorities the room for manoeuvre within the deadlines 
necessary to take account of differing national situations.
Directives are used to bring different national laws into line with each other, 
and are particularly common in matters that affect the operation of the single 
market (e.g. product safety standards).

What are "national implementing measures"?
These are texts officially adopted by the authorities in a Member State to 
incorporate the provisions in a directive into national law.
All such texts sent to us by national authorities are scrutinised to ensure 
that they will actually implement in that Member State all the measures 
required in the directive

Also, 
https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/229763/bis-13-775-transposition-guidance-how-to-implement-european-directives-effectively-revised.pdf

Unlike Directives, EU “regulations” are law from moment they are published and 
do not need implementation.

I don’t have a definitive reference for the “minimum one member state” comment, 
but it was in a new EMC Directive presentation given by UK government BIS 
department to IEEE meeting March.

Regards
Charlie

From: Anthony Thomson [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: 29 October 2014 15:00
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PSES] New Radio Equipment Directive (RED) - please read if you 
sell wireless devices into Europe

Hi Charlie,

Thanks for your assistance, but I still can't see anything preventing one 
claiming compliance to the RED. It's an EU directive which does appear to be 
currently 'in force' across Europe, though not yet 'enforceable' by law.

So why can't you claim compliance to the RED (assuming you do)? To coin a 
phrase... "there's no law against it". Or is there?

See my ongoing questions below.

Regards,
Tony
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2014 at 12:59 PM
From: "Charlie Blackham" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
To: "Anthony Thomson" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, 
"[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: RE: [PSES] New Radio Equipment Directive (RED) - please read if you 
sell wireless devices into Europe
Tony
Article 48 says that the existing legislation (R&TTE or EMC+LVD) may be used 
for equipment within scope of RED until 13 June 2017, provided it was on the 
market before 16 June 2016.
T: Yes, I can see that Article 48 permits optionally applying the R&TTED (et. 
al.), to new products, for 1 year after the RED becomes enforceable under law 
on 13 June 2016. However, I can't see how this sets the earliest date that 
compliance against the RED can be claimed, and this is what I'm trying to get 
to.
Article 49 says that RED shall be applied from 13 June 2016 (in other words, it 
is won’t be applicable until then).
T: Does Article 49 say the RED applies from 13 June 2016? To me, it tells 
Member States to have everything in place to comply with the directive by 12 
June 2016 and start enforcement on 13 June 2016. It does not prevent companies 
complying before that date, does it? I'd have thought that companies are at 
liberty to comply with requirements before thay becomes legally mandatory and 
enforceable.
T: Article 51 says the RED "enters into force" 20 days after publication in the 
OJ which equates to 11 June 2014. So the RED is currently "in force". Sadly 
there is no definitions of "in force or "into force" within the directive, so 
common definitions needs to apply. So from Article 51, isn't the RED already 
'in force', though not yet enforceable under law?.
T:  So I can see that under Article 49 that there cannot be any laws in place 
to enforce the RED's application until 13 June 2016. Surely however you can 
claim conformance before then, you just cant be penalised for not doing so 
(considering the limitation of enforcement of Article 48).
 However . . . . It’s “only” a Directives. Directives have to be implemented 
into National Law, in at least one member state, before they can be used – 
that’s the part that currently stops you.
T: Isn't that what stops Member States enforcing a Directive? Surely companies 
can still optionally conform to it, after all the RED seems to have been in 
force since 11 June 2014 (albeit not enforceable until 13 June 2016 or 13 June 
2017 if you chose to apply the R&TTED).
T: Where does this thing about "at least one member state" come from? I'd like 
a black and white reference for this. It seems to be something lots of people 
say without any solid foundation. How can an EU directive be legally 
enforceable in one EU country and not another? Isn't it 'all or nothing' (hence 
the 13 June 2016 date in the RED).
 RED is not a simple NLF alignment like 2014/30/EU and 2014/35/EU because there 
is also a change of scope and a number of items are moving into RED from 
EMC/LVD and out of R&TTE into EMC/LVD.
 There are commission workshops on RED and EMCD planned for November, and 
issues around transition are on the agenda.

Regards
Charlie

From: Anthony Thomson [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: 29 October 2014 12:34
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PSES] New Radio Equipment Directive (RED) - please read if you 
sell wireless devices into Europe

All,

I'm completely confused by this situation and some clarity really would be 
appreciated. Where in the directive does it say you that can't currently claim 
compliance to the RED (well, as of 11 June 2015 - see below).

I've heard Amund's comments below from other sources too, but I cannot find any 
basis for this in the directive.

Articles 48 through 50 mentioned by Nick merely state:
1. That the authorities cannot "impede" goods based on the RED until 13 June 
2016 (Article 48).
2. That EU countries RED enforcement laws shall be in place before, and applied 
from 13 June 2016 (Article 49).
3. The R&TTED is repealed on 13 June 2016.

None say you can't claim compliance to the RED.

Now... Article 51 states that the RED shall enter into force on the 20th day 
following its publication in the OJ. Correct me if I am wrong, but I believe 
the RED was published in the the OJ on 22 May 2014 and has therefore been in 
force from the 11 June 2015.

So if it's in force, providing you meet the provisions of the RED, which 
article(s) prevents claiming conformity? After all, it is (interpretation, 
which may well be wrong) in force?

I admit that I haven't scrutinised the whole document and all its references, 
so I presume that I have missed some key facts. The benefit of greater 
experience really would be appreciated.

Tony

Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2014 at 8:08 AM
From: "Hooper, Nick" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PSES] New Radio Equipment Directive (RED) - please read if you 
sell wireless devices into Europe
Hi
Articles 48 to 50 will also be implemented as part of the National Law, hence 
enforcing the dates below
Best regards
Nick


From: Amund Westin [mailto:[email protected]<[email protected]>]
Sent: 29 October 2014 07:52
To: Hooper, Nick; [email protected]
Subject: SV: [PSES] New Radio Equipment Directive (RED) - please read if you 
sell wireless devices into Europe

RED applies from when the first EU/EEA member state has implemented the 
directive into national law?

#Amund


Fra: Hooper, Nick [mailto:[email protected]]
Sendt: 28. oktober 2014 12:04
Til: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Emne: [PSES] New Radio Equipment Directive (RED) - please read if you sell 
wireless devices into Europe

Hello everyone.

I have been in discussion with the EU Commission and ADCO chairman as there 
seems to be an amount of misunderstanding on when you can declare compliance to 
the RED.  I explained to Lucio that we have seen a few cases of DoC and NB 
opinions to the new RED, and therefore had a question on the validity of these 
documents.
Below is the response received from the ADCO R&TTE Chairman.

“Dear Nick
We have already had such problems and administrative non compliances ☺
The new Directive (RED) is currently not applicable (will be applicable to 
products first placed on market as of 13 June 2016).  Hence the manufacturers 
cannot use, right now (i.e. for products placed on market before 13 June 2016), 
the references of RED (new Directive).
Best regards
Lucio

Lucio Cocciantelli
ADCO R&TTE Chairman”

Please ensure you read Artcile 48 to 50 of the RED, and pass this information 
on asap.

Notified Bodies should not be issuing Opinions to the RED until they are 
listed, on the yet to be published, NANDO database for RED Notified Bodies.  As 
the accreditation assessments will be taking place over the next year, it is 
unlikely the RED NANDO list will be published until late 2015 / early 2016

Nick Hooper BSc(Eng) CEng MIET
Chairman R&TTE CA
----------------------------------------------------
UL
Grove House Business Centre, Chineham Court, Lutyens,
Basingstoke, Hampshire, RG24 8AG, England



This e-mail may contain privileged or confidential information. If you are not 
the intended recipient: (1) you may not disclose, use, distribute, copy or rely 
upon this message or attachment(s); and (2) please notify the sender by reply 
e-mail, and then delete this message and its attachment(s). Underwriters 
Laboratories Inc. and its affiliates disclaim all liability for any errors, 
omissions, corruption or virus in this message or any attachments.
-
----------------------------------------------------------------

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to 
unsubscribe)<http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html>
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
David Heald <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>

This e-mail may contain privileged or confidential information. If you are not 
the intended recipient: (1) you may not disclose, use, distribute, copy or rely 
upon this message or attachment(s); and (2) please notify the sender by reply 
e-mail, and then delete this message and its attachment(s). Underwriters 
Laboratories Inc. and its affiliates disclaim all liability for any errors, 
omissions, corruption or virus in this message or any attachments.
-
----------------------------------------------------------------

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to 
unsubscribe)<http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html>
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
David Heald <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
-
----------------------------------------------------------------

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to 
unsubscribe)<http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html>
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <[email protected]>
David Heald <[email protected]>
-
----------------------------------------------------------------

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to 
unsubscribe)<http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html>
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
David Heald <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

Reply via email to