Hi Richard,

There are many thousands of initiating events. The EFT test runs at 5 kHz to 100 kHz for 15 ms bursts every 300 ms for a minute. In real life, I have measured the EFT pulses coming in at 10 MHz, so the initiating events will extend for many cycles of the power and at all relative phase angles. If coming from a motor commutator, the EFT pulses would be coming continuously for a long period of time.

I can regularly cause breakdown of various supplies that are UL certified using 800 Volt ESD or EFT, even lower to 500 Volts, and that is the generator setting. Less would be impressed across the barrier except for resonance. Obviously there is a resonance happening that increases the peak voltage and explains why some of the breakdowns are in the opposite current direction from the applied stress.

So my question really is, given all these miniature breakdowns, within a cycle of 60 Hz, would the ionized path allow more 60 Hz current to flow even though there is not enough 60 Hz voltage itself to cause a breakdown? If so, a number of 60 Hz cycles would be involved, not just one, and in the case of a motor commutator, continuously for a long period of time.

Doug

University of Oxford Tutor
Department for Continuing Education
Oxford, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom
--------------------------------------------------------------
     ___          _            Doug Smith
      \          / )           P.O. Box 60941
       =========               Boulder City, NV 89006-0941
    _ / \     / \ _            TEL/FAX: 702-570-6108/570-6013
  /  /\  \ ] /  /\  \          Mobile:  408-858-4528
 |  q-----( )  |  o  |         Email:   [email protected]
  \ _ /    ]    \ _ /          Web:     http://www.dsmith.org
--------------------------------------------------------------

On 12/6/14 1:07 PM, Richard Nute wrote:
Hi Doug:


I assume you are assuming the initiating event is an air breakdown as opposed 
to a solid insulation breakdown.

Note that, according to Paschen's Law, air does not break down below about 323 
volts peak (at sea level).

The mains voltage does not exceed 170 volts peak (for 120 volts r.m.s.).  So, 
when the initiating event is over, and the mains voltage goes through zero, the 
arc is extinguished and cannot start again.

For two-wire equipment, the current depends on the two capacitances to ground.  
The first capacitor (transformer primary-to-secondary) breaks down, and the 
second capacitor (secondary circuit to ground) controls the current.

Safety standards specify minimum clearances so that breakdown due to transient 
overvoltages is not likely.

Hope this helps.


Best regards and happy holidays,
Rich


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Saturday, December 06, 2014 10:01 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [PSES] dielectric breakdown

Hi Everyone,

Is it possible that a fast breakdown of the dielectric barrier, by a fast 
event, like ESD or EFT, in a two wire mains power supply, cause a larger 
follow-on current from the AC mains and therefore a safety problem. How about 
follow-on current from a simultaneous lightning surge that would not by itself 
cause a breakdown? Anyone know of an incident of either type? I could set up an 
experiment but don't want to set my lab bench on fire. -:)

Doug

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion 
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>



-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion 
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

Reply via email to