In message <ca+nn3167r18+1zbr3kfqw2rq9b_fd58zm-cqh83x4td8sjz...@mail.gmail.com>, dated Mon, 20 Jul 2015, Dave Heald <[email protected]> writes:

If it is generally acceptable or "good enough" to use the newer standards, I don't want to stand in the way of product release while we get the testing re-done (we know what happens to employees that take stands on technicalities that aren't important in the grand scheme of things & it's not good) However, I also don't want to give in without some input from other experts on how important this is to compliance assessment.

It's impossible to generalize; there are three cases:

1. The new edition is *exactly* the same as the earlier one for every cross-reference in the referencing standard;

2. The new edition is *exactly* the same for some cross-references, but not others;

3. The new edition is a complete re-write, so that the cross-references in the referencing standard are meaningless.

Case 1. is the only one that doesn't spell trouble. *exactly* means word-for-word and includes any Notes or examples.
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. With best wishes. See www.jmwa.demon.co.uk
When I turn my back on the sun, it's to look for a rainbow
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion 
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

Reply via email to