In message <[email protected]>,
dated Tue, 21 Jul 2015, "ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen"
<[email protected]> writes:
The basic problem is that EN 55022 is a mixed standard, describing
test methods and limits in the same text, where most immunity basic
standards (such as the EN 61000-4-ys series) have been conceived for
that role only and do not prescribe limits (suggest some only).
EN 55022 is a Product-family emission standard, EN 55024 is the
companion immunity standard. EN 55022 is indeed referred to in other
standards as if it were a Basic standard.
A product should therefore never comply to a Basic standard
(impossible); an error widely spread.
Agreed.
Basic standards are never referenced in the OJ with the EN 55022 as
exception.
See above; I don't think it's an exception, because it's a
Product-family standard. The fact that it's also used in a Basic
standard rôle is irrelevant.
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. With best wishes. See www.jmwa.demon.co.uk
When I turn my back on the sun, it's to look for a rainbow
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]>
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used
formats), large files, etc.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher: <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>
