In message <[email protected]>, dated Mon, 14 Sep
2015, Ed Price <[email protected]> writes:
True, the FCC is essentially still following the Communications Act of
1934 in its scope. However, telegraph rates aren?t so important
anymore, while the issue of consumer electronics immunity certainly is.
We expect our laws and regulations to evolve to address the important
issues of the day, junking the obsolete and helping with new conflicts.
It is interesting that the US (ANSI) participates fully in the IEC
committees on immunity, having four experts on each and holding the
Convenership of one.
Immunity is for other people, right?
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. With best wishes. See www.jmwa.demon.co.uk
When I turn my back on the sun, it's to look for a rainbow
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]>
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used
formats), large files, etc.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher: <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>
