Mike I think this is covered in section 7 of KDB 784748 D01 Labelling Part 15 &18 Guidelines v08<https://apps.fcc.gov/kdb/GetAttachment.html?id=gSc9BH6v7Z%2FdopMkplqCZQ%3D%3D&desc=784748%20D01%20Labelling%20Part%2015%2018%20Guidelines%20v08&tracking_number=27980>:
7. Multiple Authorization Procedures: A device subject to multiple authorization procedures requires appropriate testing and labelling for each of the respective authorization procedures. As a general rule, the DoC text statement supersedes any Verification statement. For devices subject to DoC and Verification, or Certification and Verification, the labelling requirements for DoC or Certification need only apply. When a device is authorized under both the DoC and Certification procedures, the DoC logo and FCC ID (or FCC IDs if applicable) are required. This requirement does not negate the testing requirement for each individual device that is subject to both multiple authorization procedures, and / or multiple technical rules. For example, an 802.11 Wi-Fi device that is also a Class B personal computer peripheral digital device must be tested as a computer peripheral (Section 15.3) and as a transmitter (Section 15.247). If the procedure for testing the computer peripheral elected DoC and since the transmitter requires certification, the device must be labelled with the DoC logo and an FCC ID. If the computer peripheral elected Certification then the device can be certified as a computer peripheral and a transmitter under one FCC ID. When supplying information to users, all relevant instructions that pertain to all components of a composite device are required. For example, Class A or Class B statements in Section 15.105; all warning statements and special instructions as required by Sections 15.21 and 15.27; and all Part 18 applicable instructions must be clearly stated. Variations in editing to clarify the language and structure are permitted if all the relevant points applicable to all of the components are represented Regards Charlie Charlie Blackham Sulis Consultants Ltd Tel: +44 (0)7946 624317 Web: www.sulisconsultants.com<https://outlook.hslive.net/owa/redir.aspx?C=02be3bf3e3a544d1bdf7b6c99fbd12f5&URL=http%3a%2f%2fwww.sulisconsultants.com%2f> Registered in England and Wales, number 05466247 From: Mike Sherman [mailto:msherma...@comcast.net] Sent: 31 October 2017 01:01 To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: [PSES] FCC Language in Manuals, Intentional Transmitter Esteemed Colleagues -- We are incorporating a modularly approved intentional transmitter into some industrial products. We understand the requirement to include on the product (or in our manuals, if the product is too small) the Part 15.19 compliance statement ("This device complies with part 15 of the FCC Rules. Operation is subject to the following two conditions: (1) This... "). However, we are also aware of two other FCC statements that appear to be required, but which we do not often see in other product manuals, including my new iPhone. Warning (Part 15.21) "Changes or modifications not expressly approved by the party responsible for compliance could void the user’s authority to operate the equipment." Information to the User (Part 15.105 a) "NOTE: This equipment has been tested and found to comply with the limits for a Class A digital device, pursuant to part 15 of the FCC Rules. These limits are designed to provide reasonable protection against harmful interference when the equipment is operated in a commercial environment. This equipment generates, uses, and can radiate radio frequency energy and, if not installed and used in accordance with the instruction manual, may cause harmful interference to radio communications. Operation of this equipment in a residential area is likely to cause harmful interference in which case the user will be required to correct the interference at his own expense." What are we missing? Are these last two warnings only required in some cases, but not in others? thanks, Mike Sherman Product Safety and Compliance Engineer Graco Inc. - ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <emc-p...@ieee.org<mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org>> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)<http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html> List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <sdoug...@ieee.org<mailto:sdoug...@ieee.org>> Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org<mailto:mcantw...@ieee.org>> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher <j.bac...@ieee.org<mailto:j.bac...@ieee.org>> David Heald <dhe...@gmail.com<mailto:dhe...@gmail.com>> - ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <emc-p...@ieee.org> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe) List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <sdoug...@ieee.org> Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <j.bac...@ieee.org> David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>
