Also should note that a computer peripheral is allowed have the single required reference and note to see manual. In any case, the TCB should specify markings in your report. And the OET has issued some rulings on product marks.
Brian -----Original Message----- From: Brian O'Connell Sent: Monday, October 30, 2017 6:25 PM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: RE: FCC Language in Manuals, Intentional Transmitter "(c) The provisions of paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section do not apply todigital devices exempted from the technical standards under the provisions of § 15.103." And, in any case, is allowed to be in the manual. And scope of 15.19 labeling stuff is found in 15.19(a). Or use Jedi mind tricks. "This is not the equipment label you are looking for..." Brian From: Mike Sherman [mailto:msherma...@comcast.net] Sent: Monday, October 30, 2017 6:01 PM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: [PSES] FCC Language in Manuals, Intentional Transmitter Esteemed Colleagues -- We are incorporating a modularly approved intentional transmitter into some industrial products. We understand the requirement to include on the product (or in our manuals, if the product is too small) the Part 15.19 compliance statement ("This device complies with part 15 of the FCC Rules. Operation is subject to the following two conditions: (1) This... "). However, we are also aware of two other FCC statements that appear to be required, but which we do not often see in other product manuals, including my new iPhone. Warning (Part 15.21) "Changes or modifications not expressly approved by the party responsible for compliance could void the user’s authority to operate the equipment." Information to the User (Part 15.105 a) "NOTE: This equipment has been tested and found to comply with the limits for a Class A digital device, pursuant to part 15 of the FCC Rules. These limits are designed to provide reasonable protection against harmful interference when the equipment is operated in a commercial environment. This equipment generates, uses, and can radiate radio frequency energy and, if not installed and used in accordance with the instruction manual, may cause harmful interference to radio communications. Operation of this equipment in a residential area is likely to cause harmful interference in which case the user will be required to correct the interference at his own expense." What are we missing? Are these last two warnings only required in some cases, but not in others? thanks, Mike Sherman Product Safety and Compliance Engineer Graco Inc. - ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <emc-p...@ieee.org> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe) List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <sdoug...@ieee.org> Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <j.bac...@ieee.org> David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>
