I took data with 4 field probes, 3 different models. All calibrated. Two 
calibrations by the manufacturer, two by a reputable cal house.

200-1000 MHz data, 10 MHz step size, 60 V/m level. I recorded the forward 
power, and all equipment and software in the setup was the same, barring only 
the measuring field probe and associated probe factors. Composite values only. 
No 3-axis data as I don't have 3-axis calibration data for all probes. Probes 
were 10 cm above a copper bench, DRG antenna 90 from the bench.

The results are not encouraging. The tables below show the results in watts of 
forward power for select frequencies.

Antenna Horizontal - values in Watts


Probe 1

Probe 2

Probe 3

Probe 4

Max-Min(Watts)

200 MHz

85.17

144.4

135.9

97.75

59.23

220 MHz

92.81

171.6

157.4

113.5

78.79

500 MHz

21.7

34.93

28.58

26.94

13.23

900 MHz

25.57

37.25

25.6

32.42

11.68


Antenna Vertical - values in Watts


Probe 1

Probe 2

Probe 3

Probe 4

Max-Min(Watts)

200 MHz

18.94

25.12

22.55

18.82

6.3

330 MHz

34.1

40.69

46.29

39.41

12.19

780 MHz

35.52

53.03

29.87

32.83

23.16

930 MHz

56.63

47.01

64.26

107.7

60.69


There are trends in the data. Probe 1 was usually the lowest. Probe 2 was 
usually the highest, rarely the lowest.

If you want to talk field strength effects this will mean, depending on the 
probe, you could have an E-field 40% higher between two 'identical' 
calibrations.  The large variance between which probe was highest or lowest 
based on freq. is troubling, as is the clear difference between horizontal and 
vertical. I took additional data with two probes of the same model rotated 
around a center axis. I don't have that all compiled, but just comparing one 
probe against itself, laying on the left, right, and bottom sides, results in 
up 20% difference in required power.

I have not read IEEE 519, but plan to soon. So my question to this group - do 
you think field probe calibrations are accurate? How can we have confidence in 
our results with such widely varying results?

Thanks,

David Schaefer




-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

Reply via email to