This standard is ten years old. A lot has happened since then, and the
document is clearly very minimal. I suggest you enquire on the ETSI web
site about any plans to update or replace the standard.
John Woodgate OOO-Own Opinions Only
J M Woodgate and Associates www.woodjohn.uk
Rayleigh, Essex UK
On 2018-07-09 22:57, Chester Summers wrote:
Dear Group,
ETSI EN 302 066-2 v1.2.1 is published in the RED’s HS list, with the
following note:
“This harmonised standard does not address requirements relating to
receiver performance parameters and does not confer a presumption of
conformity as regards those parameters.”
EN 302 066-2 doesn’t contain a single reference to receivers or
receiver testing. Normative Ref EN 302 066-1 (which is NOT published
in OJ, BTW…) only mentions “receiver” in terms of the spectrum
analyzer used to measure emissions. EN 302 066-2 v1.2.1 has not
changed from R&TTE to RED.
*How then, shall a GPR product compliant to R&TTE satisfy the RED,
when the most relevant product family standards don’t include product
receiver specification or testing?
*Is the OJ note intended to force manufacturers to the Notified Body?
Can R&TTE and RED both be referenced on a DoC in this case? I don’t
believe so, after June 2017.
This particular GPR imaging system can be ordered with a tablet PC
user interface, else the customer provides his own tablet meeting
required specs. Similar systems are marketed this way.
*Is the OJ note meant to address or regulate this practice, so that
the tablet PC’s WiFi transceiver must be assessed as part of the
“completed radio product?”
Guidance & UWB insight greatly appreciated here!
Thank you,
Chet Summers
This email and any files transmitted with it from Charles Machine
Works are confidential and intended solely for the use of the
individual or entity to which they are addressed. -
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your
e-mail to <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities
site at http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for
graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to
unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
David Heald <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]>
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used
formats), large files, etc.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher: <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>
