When designing a product with wireless communication, you should use an approved radio module if you want to keep clear of all the specific radio tests (technical challenge and expensive tests).
For instance, it the product design is made with CC1125 from Texas Inst., that doesn't mean you have an approved radio. In the CC1125 datasheet, it's written . Regulations - Suitable for Systems Targeting Compliance with Europe: ETSI EN 300 220 Category 1, .. I interpret this as by using the CC1125, you have the possibility to comply (a good starting point .), if the rest of the radio design will prove that your complete design complies with the regulations. Only by using the CC1125 is not enough for claim RED compliance for the radio part. Comments? Best regards Amund Westin - ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe) List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <[email protected]> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <[email protected]> David Heald: <[email protected]>
