Amund

The CC1125 operates over multiple frequency bands: 164-192 MHz, 274-320 MHz, 
410-480 MHz, and 820-960 MHz.

  *   You can't use all those frequencies in the EU
  *   By way of example, in sub bands such as 863-870 MHz there are various 
combinations of power, duty cycle, bandwidth that you are allowed to use 
depending on other parameters and application

Mu understanding is that this is a device that you should be confident would 
pass radio testing when integrated in accordance with their instructions, but 
it's not possible to assess a multi-band device such as this as being a RED 
compliance module


Regards
Charlie

Charlie Blackham
Sulis Consultants Ltd
Tel: +44 (0)7946 624317
Web: https://sulisconsultants.com/
Registered in England and Wales, number 05466247

From: Amund Westin <[email protected]>
Sent: 07 November 2019 09:34
To: [email protected]
Subject: [PSES] RED approval - radio chips

When designing a product with wireless communication, you should use an 
approved radio module if you want to keep clear of all the specific radio tests 
(technical challenge and expensive tests).
For instance, it the product design is made with CC1125 from Texas Inst., that 
doesn't mean you have an approved radio.
In the CC1125 datasheet, it's written ... Regulations - Suitable for Systems 
Targeting Compliance with Europe: ETSI EN 300 220 Category 1, ....

I interpret this as by using the CC1125, you have the possibility to comply (a 
good starting point ...), if the rest of the radio design will prove that your 
complete design complies with the regulations. Only by using the CC1125 is not 
enough for claim RED compliance for the radio part.

Comments?

Best regards
Amund Westin

-
----------------------------------------------------------------

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to 
unsubscribe)<http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html>
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
David Heald <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

Reply via email to