Hi Charlie:

 

Rather than guess:

 

https://www.kaptontape.com/PDF/Kapton_Films_Datasheet.pdf

https://www.dupont.com/content/dam/dupont/amer/us/en/products/ei-transformat
ion/documents/DEC-Kapton-HN-datasheet.pdf

https://www.dupont.com/content/dam/dupont/amer/us/en/products/ei-transformat
ion/documents/EI-10167-Kapton-General-Specifications.pdf

 

After looking at the above specs, I'm inclined to believe that Kapton tape
will provide an acceptable fire enclosure (as good as any other plastic
material).  It is tough stuff!  And relatively expensive.

 

If you are going to test it (as suggested by Ted), I suggest a side-by-side
test with the alternate fire enclosure plastic material.

 

Note that IEC 62368-1 uses IEC 60695-11-10 for flammability rating rather
than UL 94 and UL 510.  There are no specific requirements for
fire-enclosure tape.  

 

Stay safe, and best regards,

Rich

 

 

 

 

From: Charlie Blackham <char...@sulisconsultants.com
<mailto:char...@sulisconsultants.com> > 
Sent: Friday, October 8, 2021 6:25 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG <mailto:EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG> 
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [PSES] UL 510 Flame retardant tape

 

All

 

Various Kapton tapes are sold as Flame Retardant, some seem to reference UL
94 and others UL 510.

 

The scenario is a product falling under EN 62368-1 and the secondary lithium
battery needs a fire enclosure and rather than using the product enclosure,
one could be made for the battery using a suitable plastic or manual
application of retardant tape.

 

Is there any correlation between UL 510 and UL94 when considering creating a
Fire Enclosure for a battery as per Clause M.4.3 ?

 

 

 

Best regards

Charlie

 

Charlie Blackham

Sulis Consultants Ltd

Mead House

Longwater Road

Eversley

RG27 0NW

UK

Tel: +44 (0)7946 624317

Email:  <mailto:char...@sulisconsultants.com> char...@sulisconsultants.com

Web:
<https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fsuliscons
ultants.com%2F&data=04%7C01%7Cted.eckert%40microsoft.com%7Ca6e307923eb9431b8
04a08d98a5f1a71%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C0%7C0%7C637692963354416
861%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1h
aWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=bDpGeGKKgswxO6hhPR9RaXpY1x1P2RWBVKILs58KSnk%
3D&reserved=0> https://sulisconsultants.com/ 

Registered in England and Wales, number 05466247

 


-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<emc-p...@ieee.org>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <sdoug...@ieee.org>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>

Reply via email to