Hello experts,

 

In running through some safety checks on a customer's product I've come
across what appears to be a conflict between two clauses. This resulted in
some head scratching! I'm sure it is my misunderstanding or misreading, but
I could do with some pointers in how to unpick this.

 

Context

*       Standard is IEC EN 60335-1:2012 (+amendments)
*       Context is an exercise machine (the appliance)
*       Supply is AC mains Class I
*       Appliance has metal handles that are held during normal use. These
are connected through bearings to the metal frame but are not "reliably
earthed" (no explicit wired connection)

 

Earthing of metal parts is acceptable

22.35 For constructions other than those of class III, handles, levers and
knobs that are held or actuated in normal use shall not become live in the
event of a failure of basic insulation. If these handles, levers and knobs
are of metal and if their shafts or fixings are likely to become live in the
event of a failure of basic insulation, they shall be adequately covered by
insulating material or their accessible parts shall be separated from their
shafts or fixings by supplementary insulation.

 

For stationary appliances and cordless appliances, this requirement does not
apply to handles, levers and knobs, other than those of electrical
components, provided that they are reliably connected to an earthing
terminal or earthing contact or separated from live parts by earthed metal.

 

*       Class I appliance, with metal handles held during use so this
requirement is applicable
*       Handles are not reliably earthed so we are advising manufacturer to
make an explicit bond to PE
*       With Basic insulation and Earthing we have our two safeguards
between live and user = reduced risk of shock
*       No complaints with this clause

 

Earthing of metal parts is not accpetable

Then the next clause seems to contradict this:

 

22.36 For appliances other than those of class III, handles which are
continuously held in the hand in normal use shall be constructed so that
when gripped in normal use, the operator's hand is not likely to touch metal
parts unless they are separated from live parts by double insulation or
reinforced insulation

 

*       This clause appears to not allow for earthing of the metal handles
*       Instead, only rouble or reinforced insulation are acceptable
*       Thoughts / speculation:

o   Would this clause make more sense if it read "For appliances other than
those of class I."? i.e. unearthed

o   Talks about "appliances" (whole product) rather than "constructions"
(parts of appliance)

 

Conclusion

I'm happy that the approach of reliably earthing the metal handles will
reduce the electric shock risk in the context of the equipment, this
approach being consistent with other safety standards I know like 62368-1
and 61010-1. I just can't rationalise this with clause 22.36. As I say, I'm
sure I've misread or misunderstood something so any help would be greatly
appreciated.

 

Otherwise, if anyone has a link to an explanatory document or contact for
someone who could help at standards or committee level again that would
help.

 

All the best

James

 

James Pawson

Managing Director & EMC Problem Solver

 

Office hours:

My mornings are reserved for full attention on consultancy, testing, and
troubleshooting activities for our customers' projects. I am otherwise
contactable between 1300h to 1730h from Monday to Friday.

For inquiries, bookings, and testing updates please send us an email on
<mailto:he...@unit3compliance.co.uk> he...@unit3compliance.co.uk or call
01274 911747. Our lead times for testing and consultancy are typically 4-5
weeks.

 

Unit 3 Compliance Ltd

EMC : Environmental & Vibration : Electrical Safety : CE & UKCA :
Consultancy

 

 <http://www.unit3compliance.co.uk> www.unit3compliance.co.uk |
<mailto:ja...@unit3compliance.co.uk> ja...@unit3compliance.co.uk 

+44(0)1274 911747  |  +44(0)7811 139957

2 Wellington Business Park, New Lane, Bradford, BD4 8AL

Registered in England and Wales # 10574298

 


-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<emc-p...@ieee.org>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>
_________________________________________________
To unsubscribe from the EMC-PSTC list, click the following link: 
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=EMC-PSTC&A=1

Reply via email to