I'm not an expert in that standard, but at first glance it looks to me like
it makes a distinction between handles that are held or actuated in normal
use vs handles that are *continuously* held in the hand in normal use.
Similar to distinction made for surface temp limits in standards like 60950.

On Wed, Apr 5, 2023 at 6:52 AM Ken Javor <ken.ja...@emccompliance.com>
wrote:

> I may be missing something but the way I read it they provide you with two
> different approaches to reducing the hazard of electric shock. One is
> protective earth grounding, and the other is double insulation, or double
> electrically isolated. These are mutually exclusive, being two different
> approaches to achieving the same goal.
>
> Ken Javor
> Phone: (256) 650-5261
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From: *"Grasso, Charles" <charles.gra...@dish.com>
> *Reply-To: *"Grasso, Charles" <charles.gra...@dish.com>
> *Date: *Wed, 5 Apr 2023 07:41:02 -0600
> *To: *<EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
> *Subject: *Re: [PSES] Safety: 60335-1 conflicting clauses question -
> earthing (or not) of handles
>
> How exactly does one measure "likely" as in likely to touch? Is it a %age?
> Of course my question is tongue in cheek...
>
> On Wed, Apr 5, 2023, 4:23 AM James Pawson (U3C) <
> ja...@unit3compliance.co.uk> wrote:
>
>
> * This message originated outside of DISH and was sent by:
> ja...@unit3compliance.co.uk <http://ja...@unit3compliance.co.uk> *
> ------------------------------
> Hello experts,
>
> In running through some safety checks on a customer’s product I’ve come
> across what appears to be a conflict between two clauses. This resulted in
> some head scratching! I’m sure it is my misunderstanding or misreading, but
> I could do with some pointers in how to unpick this.
>
>
> *Context *
>
>    - Standard is IEC EN 60335-1:2012 (+amendments)
>    - Context is an exercise machine (the appliance)
>    - Supply is AC mains Class I
>    - Appliance has metal handles that are held during normal use. These
>    are connected through bearings to the metal frame but are not “reliably
>    earthed” (no explicit wired connection)
>
>
>
> *Earthing of metal parts is acceptable *
>
>
> *22.35 For constructions other than those of class III, handles, levers
> and knobs that are held or actuated in normal use shall not become live in
> the event of a failure of basic insulation. If these handles, levers and
> knobs are of metal and if their shafts or fixings are likely to become live
> in the event of a failure of basic insulation, they shall be adequately
> covered by insulating material or their accessible parts shall be separated
> from their shafts or fixings by supplementary insulation.   For stationary
> appliances and cordless appliances, this requirement does not apply to
> handles, levers and knobs, other than those of electrical components,
> provided that they are reliably connected to an earthing terminal or
> earthing contact or separated from live parts by earthed metal. *
>
>    - Class I appliance, with metal handles held during use so this
>    requirement is applicable
>    - Handles are not reliably earthed so we are advising manufacturer to
>    make an explicit bond to PE
>    - With Basic insulation and Earthing we have our two safeguards
>    between live and user = reduced risk of shock
>    - No complaints with this clause
>
>
>
> *Earthing of metal parts is not accpetable *Then the next clause seems to
> contradict this:
>
>
> *22.36 For appliances other than those of class III, handles which are
> continuously held in the hand in normal use shall be constructed so that
> when gripped in normal use, the operator's hand is not likely to touch
> metal parts unless they are separated from live parts by double insulation
> or reinforced insulation *
>
>    - This clause appears to *not* allow for earthing of the metal handles
>    - Instead, only rouble or reinforced insulation are acceptable
>    - Thoughts / speculation:
>
> o   Would this clause make more sense if it read “For appliances other
> than those of class I…”? i.e. unearthed
>
> o   Talks about “appliances” (whole product) rather than “constructions”
> (parts of appliance)
>
>
>
> *Conclusion *I’m happy that the approach of reliably earthing the metal
> handles will reduce the electric shock risk in the context of the
> equipment, this approach being consistent with other safety standards I
> know like 62368-1 and 61010-1. I just can’t rationalise this with clause
> 22.36. As I say, I’m sure I’ve misread or misunderstood something so any
> help would be greatly appreciated.
>
> Otherwise, if anyone has a link to an explanatory document or contact for
> someone who could help at standards or committee level again that would
> help.
>
> All the best
> James
>
> James Pawson
> Managing Director & EMC Problem Solver
>
>
> *Office hours: *
>
> *My mornings are reserved for full attention on consultancy, testing, and
> troubleshooting activities for our customers’ projects. I am otherwise
> contactable between 1300h to 1730h from Monday to Friday. For inquiries,
> bookings, and testing updates please send us an email on
> he...@unit3compliance.co.uk <http://he...@unit3compliance.co.uk>
> <mailto:he...@unit3compliance.co.uk <he...@unit3compliance.co.uk>>  or call
> 01274 911747. Our lead times for testing and consultancy are typically 4-5
> weeks. *
>
> *  Unit 3 Compliance Ltd *
> *EMC : Environmental & Vibration : Electrical Safety : CE & UKCA :
> Consultancy *
> www.unit3compliance.co.uk <http://www.unit3compliance.co.uk>  |
> ja...@unit3compliance.co.uk <mailto:ja...@unit3compliance.co.uk
> <ja...@unit3compliance.co.uk>>
> +44(0)1274 911747 <+44%201274%20911747>  |  +44(0)7811 139957
> <+44%207811%20139957>
> 2 Wellington Business Park, New Lane, Bradford, BD4 8AL
> Registered in England and Wales # 10574298
>
> -
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
> discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to &LT;
> emc-p...@ieee.org&GT;
>
> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
> http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
>
> Website:      http://www.ieee-pses.org/
> Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to
> unsubscribe) <http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html>
> List rules:     http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
>
> For help, send mail to the list administrators:
> Mike Cantwell &LT;mcantw...@ieee.org&GT;
>
> For policy questions, send mail to:
> Jim Bacher  &LT;j.bac...@ieee.org&GT;
> David Heald &LT;dhe...@gmail.com&GT;
> ------------------------------
>
>  To unsubscribe from the EMC-PSTC list, click the following link:
> https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=EMC-PSTC&A=1
>
> -
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
> discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <
> emc-p...@ieee.org>
>
> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
> http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
>
> Website:      http://www.ieee-pses.org/
> Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to
> unsubscribe) <http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html>
> List rules:     http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
>
> For help, send mail to the list administrators:
> Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org>
>
> For policy questions, send mail to:
> Jim Bacher  <j.bac...@ieee.org>
> David Heald <dhe...@gmail.com>
> ------------------------------
>
>  To unsubscribe from the EMC-PSTC list, click the following link:
> https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=EMC-PSTC&A=1
>
> -
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
> discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to &LT;
> emc-p...@ieee.org&GT;
>
> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
> http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
>
> Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
> Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to
> unsubscribe) <http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html>
> List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
>
> For help, send mail to the list administrators:
> Mike Cantwell &LT;mcantw...@ieee.org&GT;
>
> For policy questions, send mail to:
> Jim Bacher &LT;j.bac...@ieee.org&GT;
> David Heald &LT;dhe...@gmail.com&GT;
> ------------------------------
>
> To unsubscribe from the EMC-PSTC list, click the following link:
> https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=EMC-PSTC&A=1
>


-- 
Scott Aldous | Regulatory Compliance Manager | scottald...@google.com |
 650-253-1994

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<emc-p...@ieee.org>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>
_________________________________________________
To unsubscribe from the EMC-PSTC list, click the following link: 
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=EMC-PSTC&A=1

Reply via email to