Hi Glyn,

I understand that there should not be hazard in all expected situations (normal / abnormal use and fault condition) and USB cable is too short to consider transients. What I am trying to do is to understand 62368-1 and reading it I came to 5.4.11 that was hard for me to understand what are exact listed there requirements and if they touch my devices.

That laptop I described is an example of device that looks as being not excluded from 5.4.11, and USB is looking (for me) as being external circuits according to 62368-1 definition of this therm and being indicated in table 14. The only way to solve this laptop problem, I see, is if we have to assume that the note in table 14 of not considering transients (as USB is wholly in the same building) makes USB being not indicated in table. When first time writing my question I was not sure if I can assume this. Now I suppose that I have to assume this (if transients are not taken into account than cable is not indicated in table 14).

The device I have in mind is 12V powered access controller hawing RS485 (not isolated) and because of this RS485 I am trying to understand 5.4.11.
Now I suppose that:
1. It is permanently connected equipment so 5.4.11 not apply, and even it is not permanently connected (as being isolated from Mains by 12V supply) then 2. RS485 as being whole in one building (transients are not taken into account) is not indicated in table 14 so 5.4.11 not apply.

The typical 12V supply used (MEAN WELL DRC-40A) specification says:
  SAFETY STANDARDS:       UL60950-1, TUV EN60950-1 approved
  WITHSTAND VOLTAGE:    I/P-O/P:3KVAC I/P-FG:2KVAC O/P-FG:0.5KVAC

I always assumed that it is better to not Earth DC12V (its negative pole).
Reading 62368-2 5.4.11 description I confirm myself in this belief. Not Earthing 12V we not provide (by RS485) Earth potential to a remote environment making it being still save even if by any other fault the Mains potential can be there.
Do you agree with me?

Best Regards
Piotr Galka


W dniu 2024-05-10 o 17:26, Glyn Payne pisze:

Hi Piotr,

Maximum USB cable lengths are quite short, a few meters, and they are not designed to be part of the ‘building or structure’, hence transients are not considered for these ports. If a USB extender or hub is used to extend the USB and this is wired through the building or structure then transients would be the problem of the hub manufacturer and not your product.


    There was/is /IEC 62368-//3/: /Safety aspects for DC power
    transfer through communication cables and ports/, which is
    referenced by IEC 62368-1 however this being reworked by TC108 and
    as far as I can tell few people are using it in it’s present form.


    When testing your product under 62368-1 the test house will
    determine the maximum voltage and current the USB (or serial) port
    can provide, under normal, abnormal and fault conditions, to
    ensure that there is no hazard.


    Best regards,


Glyn Payne

*From:*Piotr Galka <piotr.ga...@micromade.pl>
*Sent:* Wednesday, May 8, 2024 9:28 PM
*To:* EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
*Subject:* Re: [PSES] IEC 62368-1: To understand chapter 5.4.11


        

You don't often get email from piotr.ga...@micromade.pl. Learn why this is important <https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification>

        

Hi Bostjan,

I know that if circuit is not going out of building it is considered being without transients. My doubt is mainly because in 5.4.11 says about circuits being external and indicated in table 14 and according to my understanding 3.3.1.1 USB was external and note about transients in table 14 for me didn't make for me USB being not indicated in table. In my RS485 design even it is in one building I assume during storm up to 50V temporary difference between several grounding points and I use 2 steps protection. I know of two such incidents that after lightning struck directly into the building, many systems stopped working, but ours did.
I acknowledge that USB is not external circuit.
Thanks a lot.

I have never bought any standard abroad and as I have written answering to Johns post I see that 62368-2 is not in current Polish Standard Committee offer.

Best regards
Piotr Galka

W dniu 2024-05-08 o 18:45, Boštjan Glavič pisze:

    Hi Piotr

    If circuit does not go out of building it is not considered as
    circuit with transients. I think you should check other standard
    like IEC 62151 and IEC 62102 which clasify external circuits.

    From my experiences, and I do have quite some, USB is not
    considered as external circuit in the sense of clause, where
    requirements between external circuit and PE are specified.

    Did you also check 62368-2?

    Best regards

    Bostjan

    Poslano iz Outlook za Android <https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg>

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------

    *Od:* Piotr Galka <piotr.ga...@micromade.pl>
    <mailto:piotr.ga...@micromade.pl>
    *Poslano:* sreda, maj 8, 2024 5:21:33 PM
    *Za:* EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG <EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
    <mailto:EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
    *Zadeva:* Re: [PSES] IEC 62368-1: To understand chapter 5.4.11



    Hi Bostjan,

    Thanks for your feedback, but...

    I am slowly and carefully reading 62368-1 for the first time.
    It defines 'external circuit' in 3.3.1.1 as "electrical circuit
    that is
    external to the equipment and is not mains".
    I assumed one device = one equipment so I thought laptop is an
    equipment. After your post I checked how equipment is defined in
    62368-1
    but in 3.3 there is no equipment definition so I don't know what is
    equipment.
    May be USB device (pendrive) connected without cable to laptop can be
    assumed being its part, or even device powered by USB (mouse,
    keyboard)
    can be assumed being its part, but USB can be used to connect other
    equipment, I think. Do laser printer being powered separately from
    mains
    connected to laptop is understood as being internal part of
    equipment?
    Laptop is probably manufactured by someone else than laser
    printer. They
    can't assume they manufacture single equipment, I think.
    In past I have read about USB being used to connect active wifi
    antenna
    located on the roof (with few hubs to extend connection length).
    Having
    all that in mind it is hard for me to accept that for 62368-1 USB is
    equipment internal circuit.

    Now.
    If we assume laptop with connected to it mouse, external keyboard and
    printer is one equipment then going to my field: do the access
    control
    controller with RFID readers connected to it by RS485 is also one
    equipment (all powered from one 12V supply, and located in one
    building)
    making RS485 connection being internal equipment circuit?
    I don't think so.

    And I repeat my main question regarding 5.4.11: Do the access
    controller
    permanently connected to 12V supply that is permanently connected to
    mains is permanently connected equipment? I think yes. Even 12V
    supply
    has isolation in it.
    If I change understanding of equipment and assume that controller
    + 12V
    supply are one equipment than thinks get easier - such understood
    equipment is permanently connected. But is it one equipment if
    controller is manufactured by someone other then 12V supply.

    Best regards
    Piotr Galka

    W dniu 2024-05-07 o 19:49, Boštjan Glavič pisze:
    > Hi Piotr
    >
    > USB circuit is internal circuit. There are no transients
    expected on USB. Clause 5.4.11 is not applicable for power supply
    with USB output.
    >
    > Paired conductor is a telecommunication network that we had in
    old times (analogue network, ISDN,...).
    >
    > I hope this helps. If you need more info, you can contact me.
    >
    > Best regards,
    > Boštjan
    >
    >
    >
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: Piotr Galka <piotr.ga...@micromade.pl>
    <mailto:piotr.ga...@micromade.pl>
    > Sent: Tuesday, May 7, 2024 5:40 PM
    > To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
    > Subject: [PSES] IEC 62368-1: To understand chapter 5.4.11
    >
    > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of our organisation.
    Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognise the
    sender and know the content is safe.
    >
    >
    > Trying to understand 62368-1...
    >
    > I have got laptop with type A power supply so it looks being not
    excluded from 5.4.11 by rules in 5.4.11.1.
    > For me USB are external circuits indicated in Table 14, ID
    numbers 1 and
    > 2 (I think USB is 'Paired conductor', but even not it certainly
    is 'Any other conductors').
    > The note in Table 14 about not taking into account transients
    for external circuits installed wholly within the same building is
    only about transients so I think it doesn't make USB being not
    indicated in table.
    > USB cable can be used to connect laptop to printer and in
    printer USB can be earthed, I think.
    > Dos this means that according to first sentence of 5.4.11.2 each
    USB port in this laptop should be separated from its other USB ports?
    > I don't believe there is such requirement.
    >
    > My real problem to understand is as follows:
    > Typical access controller have several not separated from each
    other inputs (several RFID reader inputs, door state control
    input, tamper inputs and others).
    > I need to understand if the access controller powered from
    (external to
    > it) 12V DC buffered (= having accu in it) supply is permanently
    connected equipment or not?
    > To disconnect it from 12V supply you need tools, to disconnect
    12V supply from mains you need tools, but 12V supply has isolation
    in it so access controller is not electrically connected to mains
    and 3.3.3.4 says about needing tools to disconnect from mains (if
    something is not connected than tools are not needed to make it
    being disconnected, I think).
    > Being permanently connected equipment is the easiest way for
    controller to be excluded from 5.4.11.
    > But if it is not permanently connected than its inputs are in
    the same situation as laptop USB ports I described first as more
    common to everyone.
    >
    > What I miss or wrongly understand?
    >
    > Regards
    > Piotr Galka
    >
    > P.S.
    > Last month free time I spend browsing about 2800 EMC-PSTC posts
    collected by my mail program for few years.
    >
    > -
    > ----------------------------------------------------------------
    > This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
    emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your
    e-mail to EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
    >
    > All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
    > https://www.mail-archive.com/emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org/
    >
    > Website: https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/
    > Instructions: https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/list.html (including
    how to unsubscribe) List rules:
    https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/listrules.html
    >
    > For help, send mail to the list administrators:
    > Mike Sherman at: msherma...@comcast.net
    > Rick Linford at: linf...@ieee.org
    >
    > For policy questions, send mail to:
    > Jim Bacher: <j.bac...@ieee.org> <mailto:j.bac...@ieee.org>
    > _________________________________________________
    > To unsubscribe from the EMC-PSTC list, click the following link:
    https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=EMC-PSTC&A=1
    <https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=EMC-PSTC&A=1>
    >
    > -
    > ----------------------------------------------------------------
    > This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
    emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your
    e-mail to EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
    >
    > All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
    > https://www.mail-archive.com/emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org/
    >
    > Website: https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/
    > Instructions: https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/list.html (including
    how to unsubscribe)
    > List rules: https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/listrules.html
    >
    > For help, send mail to the list administrators:
    > Mike Sherman at: msherma...@comcast.net
    > Rick Linford at: linf...@ieee.org
    >
    > For policy questions, send mail to:
    > Jim Bacher: <j.bac...@ieee.org> <mailto:j.bac...@ieee.org>
    > _________________________________________________
    > To unsubscribe from the EMC-PSTC list, click the following link:
    https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=EMC-PSTC&A=1
    <https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=EMC-PSTC&A=1>

    -
    ----------------------------------------------------------------
    This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
    emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your
    e-mail to EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG

    All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
    https://www.mail-archive.com/emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org/

    Website: https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/
    Instructions: https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/list.html (including
    how to unsubscribe)
    List rules: https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/listrules.html

    For help, send mail to the list administrators:
    Mike Sherman at: msherma...@comcast.net
    Rick Linford at: linf...@ieee.org

    For policy questions, send mail to:
    Jim Bacher: <j.bac...@ieee.org> <mailto:j.bac...@ieee.org>
    _________________________________________________
    To unsubscribe from the EMC-PSTC list, click the following link:
    https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=EMC-PSTC&A=1
    <https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=EMC-PSTC&A=1>

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------

    This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
    emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your
    e-mail to EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG

    All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
    https://www.mail-archive.com/emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org/
    <https://www.mail-archive.com/emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org/%20>

    Website: https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/
    Instructions: https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/list.html (including
    how to unsubscribe) <https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/list.html>
    List rules: https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/listrules.html

    For help, send mail to the list administrators:
    Mike Sherman at: msherma...@comcast.net
    Rick Linford at: linf...@ieee.org

    For policy questions, send mail to:
    Jim Bacher at: j.bac...@ieee.org

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------

    To unsubscribe from the EMC-PSTC list, click the following link:
    https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=EMC-PSTC&A=1
    <https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=EMC-PSTC&A=1>

------------------------------------------------------------------------

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
https://www.mail-archive.com/emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org/ <https://www.mail-archive.com/emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org/%20>

Website: https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/
Instructions: https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/list.html (including how to unsubscribe) <https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/list.html>
List rules: https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Mike Sherman at: msherma...@comcast.net
Rick Linford at: linf...@ieee.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher at: j.bac...@ieee.org

------------------------------------------------------------------------

To unsubscribe from the EMC-PSTC list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=EMC-PSTC&A=1 <https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=EMC-PSTC&A=1>

------------------------------------------------------------------------

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
https://www.mail-archive.com/emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org/

Website: https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/
Instructions: https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/list.html (including how to unsubscribe) <https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/list.html>
List rules: https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Mike Sherman at: msherma...@comcast.net
Rick Linford at: linf...@ieee.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher at: j.bac...@ieee.org

------------------------------------------------------------------------

To unsubscribe from the EMC-PSTC list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=EMC-PSTC&A=1


-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
https://www.mail-archive.com/emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org/

Website:  https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/
Instructions:  https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/list.html (including how to 
unsubscribe)
List rules: https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Mike Sherman at: msherma...@comcast.net
Rick Linford at: linf...@ieee.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <j.bac...@ieee.org>
_________________________________________________
To unsubscribe from the EMC-PSTC list, click the following link: 
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=EMC-PSTC&A=1

Reply via email to