Hi Piotr,
Just to add to the debate:
“I know that if circuit is not going out of building it is considered
being without transients”
If a cable is longer than 30m then most product EMC standards will
call up a requirement for line-to-earth surge testing. Some do make it
explicit that this should be only for cables leaving a building or
site, some do not…
All the best
James
James Pawson
Managing Director & EMC Problem Solver
*Unit 3 Compliance Ltd*
*EMC : Environmental & Vibration : Electrical Safety : CE & UKCA :
Consultancy*
www.unit3compliance.co.uk <http://www.unit3compliance.co.uk/> |
ja...@unit3compliance.co.uk <mailto:ja...@unit3compliance.co.uk>
+44(0)1274 911747 | +44(0)7811 139957
2 Wellington Business Park, New Lane, Bradford, BD4 8AL
Registered in England and Wales # 10574298
/Office hours:/
/Every morning my full attention is on consultancy, testing, and
troubleshooting activities for our customers’ projects. I’m
available/contactable between 1300h to 1730h Mon/Tue/Thurs/Fri./
/For inquiries, bookings, and testing updates please send us an email
on he...@unit3compliance.co.uk or call 01274 911747. Our lead times
for testing and consultancy are typically 4-5 weeks./
*From:*Piotr Galka <piotr.ga...@micromade.pl>
*Sent:* Wednesday, May 8, 2024 9:28 PM
*To:* EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
*Subject:* Re: [PSES] IEC 62368-1: To understand chapter 5.4.11
Hi Bostjan,
I know that if circuit is not going out of building it is considered
being without transients. My doubt is mainly because in 5.4.11 says
about circuits being external and indicated in table 14 and according
to my understanding 3.3.1.1 USB was external and note about transients
in table 14 for me didn't make for me USB being not indicated in table.
In my RS485 design even it is in one building I assume during storm up
to 50V temporary difference between several grounding points and I use
2 steps protection. I know of two such incidents that after lightning
struck directly into the building, many systems stopped working, but
ours did.
I acknowledge that USB is not external circuit.
Thanks a lot.
I have never bought any standard abroad and as I have written
answering to Johns post I see that 62368-2 is not in current Polish
Standard Committee offer.
Best regards
Piotr Galka
W dniu 2024-05-08 o 18:45, Boštjan Glavič pisze:
Hi Piotr
If circuit does not go out of building it is not considered as
circuit with transients. I think you should check other standard
like IEC 62151 and IEC 62102 which clasify external circuits.
From my experiences, and I do have quite some, USB is not
considered as external circuit in the sense of clause, where
requirements between external circuit and PE are specified.
Did you also check 62368-2?
Best regards
Bostjan
Poslano iz Outlook za Android <https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*Od:*Piotr Galka <piotr.ga...@micromade.pl>
<mailto:piotr.ga...@micromade.pl>
*Poslano:* sreda, maj 8, 2024 5:21:33 PM
*Za:* EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG <EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
<mailto:EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
*Zadeva:* Re: [PSES] IEC 62368-1: To understand chapter 5.4.11
Hi Bostjan,
Thanks for your feedback, but...
I am slowly and carefully reading 62368-1 for the first time.
It defines 'external circuit' in 3.3.1.1 as "electrical circuit
that is
external to the equipment and is not mains".
I assumed one device = one equipment so I thought laptop is an
equipment. After your post I checked how equipment is defined in
62368-1
but in 3.3 there is no equipment definition so I don't know what is
equipment.
May be USB device (pendrive) connected without cable to laptop can be
assumed being its part, or even device powered by USB (mouse,
keyboard)
can be assumed being its part, but USB can be used to connect other
equipment, I think. Do laser printer being powered separately from
mains
connected to laptop is understood as being internal part of
equipment?
Laptop is probably manufactured by someone else than laser
printer. They
can't assume they manufacture single equipment, I think.
In past I have read about USB being used to connect active wifi
antenna
located on the roof (with few hubs to extend connection length).
Having
all that in mind it is hard for me to accept that for 62368-1 USB is
equipment internal circuit.
Now.
If we assume laptop with connected to it mouse, external keyboard and
printer is one equipment then going to my field: do the access
control
controller with RFID readers connected to it by RS485 is also one
equipment (all powered from one 12V supply, and located in one
building)
making RS485 connection being internal equipment circuit?
I don't think so.
And I repeat my main question regarding 5.4.11: Do the access
controller
permanently connected to 12V supply that is permanently connected to
mains is permanently connected equipment? I think yes. Even 12V
supply
has isolation in it.
If I change understanding of equipment and assume that controller
+ 12V
supply are one equipment than thinks get easier - such understood
equipment is permanently connected. But is it one equipment if
controller is manufactured by someone other then 12V supply.
Best regards
Piotr Galka
W dniu 2024-05-07 o 19:49, Boštjan Glavič pisze:
> Hi Piotr
>
> USB circuit is internal circuit. There are no transients
expected on USB. Clause 5.4.11 is not applicable for power supply
with USB output.
>
> Paired conductor is a telecommunication network that we had in
old times (analogue network, ISDN,...).
>
> I hope this helps. If you need more info, you can contact me.
>
> Best regards,
> Boštjan
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Piotr Galka <piotr.ga...@micromade.pl>
<mailto:piotr.ga...@micromade.pl>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 7, 2024 5:40 PM
> To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
> Subject: [PSES] IEC 62368-1: To understand chapter 5.4.11
>
> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of our organisation.
Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognise the
sender and know the content is safe.
>
>
> Trying to understand 62368-1...
>
> I have got laptop with type A power supply so it looks being not
excluded from 5.4.11 by rules in 5.4.11.1.
> For me USB are external circuits indicated in Table 14, ID
numbers 1 and
> 2 (I think USB is 'Paired conductor', but even not it certainly
is 'Any other conductors').
> The note in Table 14 about not taking into account transients
for external circuits installed wholly within the same building is
only about transients so I think it doesn't make USB being not
indicated in table.
> USB cable can be used to connect laptop to printer and in
printer USB can be earthed, I think.
> Dos this means that according to first sentence of 5.4.11.2 each
USB port in this laptop should be separated from its other USB ports?
> I don't believe there is such requirement.
>
> My real problem to understand is as follows:
> Typical access controller have several not separated from each
other inputs (several RFID reader inputs, door state control
input, tamper inputs and others).
> I need to understand if the access controller powered from
(external to
> it) 12V DC buffered (= having accu in it) supply is permanently
connected equipment or not?
> To disconnect it from 12V supply you need tools, to disconnect
12V supply from mains you need tools, but 12V supply has isolation
in it so access controller is not electrically connected to mains
and 3.3.3.4 says about needing tools to disconnect from mains (if
something is not connected than tools are not needed to make it
being disconnected, I think).
> Being permanently connected equipment is the easiest way for
controller to be excluded from 5.4.11.
> But if it is not permanently connected than its inputs are in
the same situation as laptop USB ports I described first as more
common to everyone.
>
> What I miss or wrongly understand?
>
> Regards
> Piotr Galka
>
> P.S.
> Last month free time I spend browsing about 2800 EMC-PSTC posts
collected by my mail program for few years.
>
> -
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your
e-mail to EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
>
> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
> https://www.mail-archive.com/emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org/
>
> Website: https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/
> Instructions: https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/list.html (including
how to unsubscribe) List rules:
https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/listrules.html
>
> For help, send mail to the list administrators:
> Mike Sherman at: msherma...@comcast.net
> Rick Linford at: linf...@ieee.org
>
> For policy questions, send mail to:
> Jim Bacher: <j.bac...@ieee.org> <mailto:j.bac...@ieee.org>
> _________________________________________________
> To unsubscribe from the EMC-PSTC list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=EMC-PSTC&A=1
<https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=EMC-PSTC&A=1>
>
> -
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your
e-mail to EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
>
> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
> https://www.mail-archive.com/emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org/
>
> Website: https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/
> Instructions: https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/list.html (including
how to unsubscribe)
> List rules: https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/listrules.html
>
> For help, send mail to the list administrators:
> Mike Sherman at: msherma...@comcast.net
> Rick Linford at: linf...@ieee.org
>
> For policy questions, send mail to:
> Jim Bacher: <j.bac...@ieee.org> <mailto:j.bac...@ieee.org>
> _________________________________________________
> To unsubscribe from the EMC-PSTC list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=EMC-PSTC&A=1
<https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=EMC-PSTC&A=1>
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your
e-mail to EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
https://www.mail-archive.com/emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org/
Website: https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/
Instructions: https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/list.html (including
how to unsubscribe)
List rules: https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/listrules.html
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Mike Sherman at: msherma...@comcast.net
Rick Linford at: linf...@ieee.org
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher: <j.bac...@ieee.org> <mailto:j.bac...@ieee.org>
_________________________________________________
To unsubscribe from the EMC-PSTC list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=EMC-PSTC&A=1
<https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=EMC-PSTC&A=1>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your
e-mail to EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
https://www.mail-archive.com/emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org/
<https://www.mail-archive.com/emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org/%20>
Website: https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/
Instructions: https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/list.html (including
how to unsubscribe) <https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/list.html>
List rules: https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/listrules.html
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Mike Sherman at: msherma...@comcast.net
Rick Linford at: linf...@ieee.org
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher at: j.bac...@ieee.org
------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the EMC-PSTC list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=EMC-PSTC&A=1
<https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=EMC-PSTC&A=1>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your
e-mail to EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
https://www.mail-archive.com/emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org/
<https://www.mail-archive.com/emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org/%20>
Website: https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/
Instructions: https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/list.html (including how
to unsubscribe) <https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/list.html>
List rules: https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/listrules.html
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Mike Sherman at: msherma...@comcast.net
Rick Linford at: linf...@ieee.org
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher at: j.bac...@ieee.org
------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the EMC-PSTC list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=EMC-PSTC&A=1
<https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=EMC-PSTC&A=1>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your
e-mail to EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
https://www.mail-archive.com/emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org/
Website: https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/
Instructions: https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/list.html (including how
to unsubscribe) <https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/list.html>
List rules: https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/listrules.html
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Mike Sherman at: msherma...@comcast.net
Rick Linford at: linf...@ieee.org
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher at: j.bac...@ieee.org
------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the EMC-PSTC list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=EMC-PSTC&A=1
