I asked MS Copilot AI chatbot about this general scenario and here’s what it 
suggested:

=====================

A reasonable plan could look like:

1.      Define segments:

*       Segment A:  Genset output to main distribution (excluding genset 
windings).
*       Segment B:  Each 480 V motor feeder (cable from panel to motor, motor 
isolated).
*       Segment C:  Control power circuits and control wiring (electronics 
removed/bypassed).

2.      Choose DC hipot for large segments:

*       Use DC hipot at an agreed voltage (e.g., DC equivalent of the AC 
requirement) to keep current manageable.
*       Ramp up slowly, hold for 1 minute, monitor leakage current.

3.      Use insulation resistance tests where appropriate:

*       For long runs or sensitive circuits, use 500 V DC IR tests with a 
defined minimum MΩ value, referencing IEC 60204‑1 as supporting practice.

4.      Document everything:

*       Test plan with rationale (size, capacitance, outdoor use).
*       Drawings showing segmentation and isolation points.
*       Records of test results for each segment.

5.      Review with your certifier/AHJ early:

*       Send them the plan before you build your test setup.
*       Adjust voltages or segmentation based on their feedback rather than 
after the fact.

         

That seems a solid approach and likely a good stating point for you.

Ralph

  _____  

If you want, tell me roughly how many motors, approximate cable lengths, and 
whether you have any electronics in the control panels (PLCs, HMIs, VFDs, 
etc.). I can sketch a more specific test sequence and example acceptance 
criteria that would be realistic for your exact machine.

 

 

From: Chester Summers <[email protected]> 
Sent: February 27, 2026 12:27 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [PSES] hipot considerations for large electric machinery?

 

Hello, colleagues—

 

I’m looking at hipot testing a physically large electric machine and trying to 
determine the best approach to complete the task.  NFPA 79 & C22.2 No. 301 say 
hipot is required, IEC 60204-1 leaves it to the manufacturer’s consideration.  
The machine supports outdoor construction work, contains several 3-phase 480V 
motors and is powered by on-board genset, all mounted on semi truck trailer.  
Process control is done through simple pushbutton switchgear panels.  There are 
no programmed electronics or PCBs.  

 

This is by far the largest product I’ve considered for hipot.  Isolation of the 
product isn’t feasible (won’t fit on test table :)  and disassembly is strictly 
limited.  I’m looking for practical guidance from those that routinely test and 
inspect physically large equipment.  IR and ground bond testing are already 
planned.  Risk assessment thus far tells me hipot may not be essential, 
however, the standards say…

 

How should I address this elephant?

 

Thanks in advance & best regards,

Chet Summers   

 


 


 


 


 

 

 

 

  _____  

This electronic message including any attachments ("Message") may contain 
information that is privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure 
under trade secret and other applicable law. If you are not the intended 
recipient, notify the sender immediately, permanently delete all copies of this 
Message, and be aware that examination, use, dissemination, duplication or 
disclosure of this Message is strictly prohibited. This email and any files 
transmitted with it from Charles Machine Works are confidential and intended 
solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. 

  _____  

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>  

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 
https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ 
<https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/%20>  

Website: https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/  <https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/> 
Instructions: https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/list.html (including how to 
unsubscribe) <https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/list.html> 
List rules: 
https://pses.ieee.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/EM-PSTC-List-Rules.pdf 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Mike Sherman at: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
Rick Linford at: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>  

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher at: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>  

  _____  

To unsubscribe from the EMC-PSTC list, click the following link: 
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=EMC-PSTC 
<https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=EMC-PSTC&A=1> &A=1 


-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
[email protected]

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

Website:  https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/
Instructions:  https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/list.html (including how to 
unsubscribe)
List rules: 
https://pses.ieee.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/EM-PSTC-List-Rules.pdf

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Mike Sherman at: [email protected]
Rick Linford at: [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
_________________________________________________
To unsubscribe from the EMC-PSTC list, click the following link: 
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=EMC-PSTC&A=1

Reply via email to