It could also be me reading it wrong.  I had an issue trying to home
using a shared limit pin.  The one axis I was homing was fine but all
the others would fault.  No way around it after the ignore limit code
was made single axis.

Long ago we found that motion stuttered during homing.  Some sort of
pause in the motion while EMC looked at the home pin.  If this is still
the case, it might cause the increased following error that was
observed.

Ray




On Wed, 2007-06-13 at 16:30 +0300, Alex Joni wrote:
> Ray,
> 
> I don't think it's a matter of development thinking.
> If he hits teh limit switch and that physically disables his drives then 
> it's not soemtihng you can overcome by software,
> or maybe am I reading it all wrong?
> 
> Regards,
> Alex
> 
> 
> > Wah.  We really need to get some sort of order in our development
> > thinking here.  Sure professional machines use three switches at one end
> > of travel and two at the other but that does not obviate the need for
> > lesser systems for us little light machine guys.
> 
> >> Note: Indepentantly of EMC2, the limit switches disable the servo amps
> >> in the current direction of travel only.
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
> Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
> control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
> http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
> _______________________________________________
> Emc-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
> 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to