I don't know. I think that the protocol used across the network is fairly lightweight. I would think that you would have to re-do the realtime latency test while using the remote desktop to find out for sure.
Andy Kirk Wallace wrote: > This is what came to mind first, but I wonder if some processes could be > off-loaded to free up resources for control type stuff? VNC and remote X > sessions burn up allot of processing and network bandwidth don't they? > > On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 15:20 -0700, Andrew Ayre wrote: >> Wouldn't it be easier to use remote desktop type functionality? For >> example VNC? >> >> If the PC that connects to the CNC machine is headless I think there is >> vnc4server, which only runs a desktop when you connect via VNC. Not 100% >> sure and I haven't tried it. >> >> Andy >> >> Kirk Wallace wrote: >>> I would like to run AXIS remotely. I wrote some notes: >>> >>> http://www.wallacecompany.com/machine_shop/EMC2/remote_notes.html >>> >>> to help me keep things sorted out. I am going to give it a try, but if >>> anyone has comments or corrections, please let me know. Thanks. >>> -- Andy PGP Key ID: 0x67090A54 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
