On Thursday 24 April 2008, Gene Heskett wrote:
>On Thursday 24 April 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> Gene Heskett wrote:
>>>> A bit rough on an obvious newbie, John.  In this case, and reading
>>>> between the
>>>> lines, I'm guessing that the terminology and format of the questions
>>>> stepconf
>>>> is asking are in effect, swahili to the OP, they are quite concise
>>>> because of
>>>> the gui's limits. When I ran it the first time, there were several items
>>>> I
>>>> didn't get right as the wording was somewhat ambiguous.
>>>
>>> I'll admit I was a bit rough, and I apologize.  But...
>>>
>>>> He will in time learn, if we are willing to help, but first we need to
>>>> know
>>>> which question the OP is attempting to derive the answer to.
>>>
>>> EXACTLY!
>>>
>>> He didn't say "I've done steps 1, 2, and 3, but I'm stuck on step 4".
>>> He said "give me the numbers".  And when John Thornton asked him "Which
>>> number", he said "all of them".
>>>
>>> I am more than willing to try to help.  But the person asking for help
>>> has to put in some effort too.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> John Kasunich
>>>
>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
>>> Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100.
>>> Use priority code J8TL2D2.
>>> http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/ja
>>>v aone _______________________________________________
>>> Emc-users mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>>
>>I've tried putting numbers in like 400 steps per rev .5 micro stepping
>>and the machine only travels half the distance that you tell it to. Also
>>the Y and Z axes run backwords and I can't figure out where to go from
>>here. any help would be greatly appreciated.
>
>If they are running backwards, you can use a minus sign in front of the
> scale value, or you can interchange the ends of one winding only either at
> the motor or at the terminals of the driver package.
>
>I don't recall now if you stated what driver package is used, and I'm not
>familiar enough with the Sherline to know that.  If they were xylotex
> drives, they are setup to default to 8 microsteps, others may be more, or
> less.
>
>This all goes into figuring out the scale value to be used, and it sounds
> like the driver is set for twice as many microsteps as the software is. 
> The more microsteps, the smoother the motor will move, particularly in its
> self resonant range, it can make a huge diff in the working torque at those
> speeds, in favor of the microstepped motor.
>
>
>Here are some 'rules of thumb'
>1. 99% of the stepper motors used for this need 200 full steps for one
>revolution.
>
>2. If the driver microsteps the motor by a factor of 8, then the motor will
>need to see 200*8=1600 steps for a full turn.  Scale this according to the
>number of microsteps your driver is doing.
>
>3. If the motors are directly driving the screws, and I'm reasonably sure
>Sherline is, then this 1600 needs to be multiplied by the number of threads
>per _your_ unit of measure.  Eg, if you are running in inches, and the
>leadscrew in the mill is a 20 tpi screw, then 1200x20=32000 for the scale.
>
Damn typu's!  1600*20=32000 obviously.

>4. Then for MAXVEL, until you know what the machine can actually do, pick
>something safe like maybe 3, and set a somewhat lower limit for MAXACCEL, 2,
>2.5 maybe.  Exercise that using the stepconf test facility by giving it a
>range over which it is to move the motor, say 2" each way, and hit run.  If
>it moves ok, but seems slow and you can hear the motors slowing down and
>winding up to speed at each end of the moves, increase MAXACCEL and MAXVEL
> by half a point & retry.  At some point the motor may freeze and buzz or
> sing, if the move is well under way when this occurs, reduce MAXVEL by a
> full point so you have a safety margin under load, but if it does this just
> as its reversing, then MAXACCEL is too high, reduce it a full point, and
> move on to do the same thing with the next axis.
>
>Practice may find that these will still need to be tweaked one way or the
>other, but that should get you at least playing in the ballpark.
>
>I hope this helps.



-- 
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
Hedonist for hire... no job too easy!

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. 
Use priority code J8TL2D2. 
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to