> Is an apology you are looking for? > Is .NOT. I'm just telling everyone(over and over) who says i had .NOT. read manuals, .AND. didn't asked help following protocols, and a lot of etc... that was .NOT. my fault, i did what i always do, fist read docs then make my decission, then if something does not work, ask for help. .AND. i have found some people who likes to put blame on others without even stop to read, not only what i wrote, but neither the manual i refferenced.(1 year ago)
BUT!... i would like some kind of that (apologise) from people who can only read a single sentence and think the whole paragraph meaning is there. I know that the people behind EMC development (or at least some of them) did and do read and think correctly, but there seems to be a lot of this list readers/writers who can't stop to think a little bit about what they read .AND. .OR. where things point to. Just trying to end this. Best regards. > I am a member of EMC's development. I, personally am sorry > that your experience with EMC was less then what you hoped. > I can assure you no one was trying to pull a fast one on you. > Certainly no one was trying to fraud you. > The hostmot2 software was and is very new. When the person who > writes the software tests it it is fairly easy to miss bugs because the > person tends to use it as he intended. The more it is used by other people > (especially non programmers) the more these are flushed out. As Developers > we support this by fixing them as best and fast as we can. Now programmers > (as a rule) are just terrible about documentation. Docs are boring - new > features > are fun. > Actually the docs are way way better now then even a year ago, as far as > being > up to date, correct and usable. But they are just like the software / > programmers. > When you write them they make sense to you but you knew what you meant! > On top of that, in a rapidly developing project it's pretty easy to have the > docs > (usually just slightly) out of date. > > We are not perfect - we just try to do our best. > > On our side, yes maybe we need to evaluate how we release or advertise the > state of our software. In fact we have already discussed it in general, to > avoid > problems. > The real problem comes that we think it is right/ bug free because we have > tested / used it . But the software is complicated and flexible- we need more > people to test / use it. We don't pay people to test. I'm pretty sure profit > companies do. So we release it. If and when problems come up we fix them. > In most cases the problems that come up are obscure / minor anyways. > Usually this works very well-sometimes not so well. > > I understand it can be very frustrating, it is frustrating for us too- we > want people > to have success and fun with EMC! > But no one likes to be 'beat-up' over these problems, especially if we are > not paid > to put up with it. We do this because we like the challenge, or like to give > back, > or like to tinker..... > > So Richard again I am sorry things worked out so badly for you. > If you still want help with using the mesa board and EMC we can > help but you have to stop the negativity now. Your point is across now > > To everyone else: We got our point across too - lets move on to some > positive energy. If things need changing to help a new person out then > lets hear it or volunteer to help do it. If there is problems or > disappointments > lets get to the point, keep the negativity to the minimum, And lets fix it! > > I think what this situation is really saying is that EMC is getting heard > about- > now it's not just the gurus and power tinkers that want to use it, regular > people who don't want to invest the time to learn why something works > they just want to use it. As far as I'm concerned I say welcome- we'll try to > help. > > Chris Morley > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Attention all humans. We are your photos. Free us. > http://go.microsoft.com/?linkid=9666046 > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge > This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time, > vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will have > the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge. See full prize > details at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/Challenge > _______________________________________________ > Emc-users mailing list > Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time, vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will have the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge. See full prize details at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/Challenge _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
