On 13 December 2010 16:02, Stuart Stevenson <[email protected]> wrote:
> The designation of XYZABCUVW symbols for each axis is an arbitrary exercise > ie. X could be any axis whether linear or rotary. The symbol just allows > human understanding. I don't think that this is absolutely true, I think there are subtle distinctions between the axes, especially with respect to overall velocity control, which I think might only be calculated for XYZ movements. This is very unlikely to matter for a bending machine, however. -- atp "Torque wrenches are for the obedience of fools and the guidance of wise men" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Oracle to DB2 Conversion Guide: Learn learn about native support for PL/SQL, new data types, scalar functions, improved concurrency, built-in packages, OCI, SQL*Plus, data movement tools, best practices and more. http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdev2dev _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
