On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 1:00 PM, Kirk Wallace <kwall...@wallacecompany.com>wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-02-03 at 12:33 -0600, Igor Chudov wrote: > ... snip > > Guys! Please! This is _NOT_ sticktion! > ... snip > > Sorry about that. I'm not trying to say it is stiction. I was trying to > explore ways to prove it isn't or to find a means to find the true > nature of the joint dynamics. The frustrating part for me is that I'm > not out in the shop pursuing answers rather than posing questions. > > Kirk, I know that you all are awesome guys, a wealth of knowledge and this is the most helpful mailing list that I have ever been on. I just tried to steer the discussion in the direction that I think is the right one. ;-) Anyhow, how hard do you think is it for a C++ programmer to add a friction compensation to EMC? Ergo, look at Andy's post from a while ago: http://www.mail-archive.com/emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net/msg22729.html It would appear that friction compensation (let me call it FFF for now) is just one more term, something like ... + FFF*<direction of rotation> + ... where <direction of rotation> is sign( C-M ) Am I making sense? i ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Special Offer-- Download ArcSight Logger for FREE (a $49 USD value)! Finally, a world-class log management solution at an even better price-free! Download using promo code Free_Logger_4_Dev2Dev. Offer expires February 28th, so secure your free ArcSight Logger TODAY! http://p.sf.net/sfu/arcsight-sfd2d _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
