I was searching the web and came across this paper:
about nurbs planning including s curve acceleration.
www.cadanda.com/CAD_4_1-4__34.PDF
Above my pay grade but interesting.
I was also thinking it would be interesting to discuss
the frame work of a linuxcnc3.
Is it useful to start clean on everything?
What would we drop and/or add to a must-have list.
What would the goals be?
What have we learned so far good and bad?
Who would actually be interested in doing the work?
And on the side of that who would/could document the
innards of linuxcnc so some less skilled programmers
could contribute.
Just to start the discussion:
I think HAL as a whole would be pretty much just used
as is. I'm sure some technical things could be improved
but the modularity, flexibility and relative simplicity of
HAL sure makes it a winner.
Personally I'd like to see the languages pared down to
C,C++, and python. Which it seems we are mostly going
that way anyways.
I would think that it would be a long term goal much like JA3.
Of course I'm thinking on the developers side, what do integrators
wish for? I mean besides jog while paused :)
Is S curve acceleration or look ahead really a wanted feature?
Are people happy with the GUI/ screen options that are starting
to open up?
Chris M
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
