In a single direction (read: type 1 cycle) - either. The moves generated in
either case are the same, it's simply the syntax which they are called with
(and what bugs it may introduce elsewhere).

I have only ignored it so far since it reduces the number of things to worry
about at one time.

For type 2 (pockets, much further down the line) it's potentially a bit more
complex, but should still be workable. Since linuxcnc actually stores tool
shapes (well, front/back angle and radius) the issues some controllers have
with changing tip direction can probably be avoided.

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Radek [mailto:ch...@timeguy.com] 
Sent: 27 August 2012 19:22
To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] G71 lathe roughing cycle

On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 05:35:28PM +0100, Ben Potter wrote:

> 7) Completely different method to other controllers

Like others I don't have a problem with this when other controllers are
excessively weird or contrary to how ngc works.

I am curious which, if either, approach (C or remap) would eventually be
able to work with cutter compensation turned on.  For most lathe tool shapes
it's necessary to use compensation whenever you have an arc or even a
straight feature that's not parallel to an axis.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat
landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will
include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to