Am 27.08.2012 um 20:22 schrieb Chris Radek: > On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 05:35:28PM +0100, Ben Potter wrote: > >> 7) Completely different method to other controllers > > Like others I don't have a problem with this when other controllers > are excessively weird or contrary to how ngc works. > > I am curious which, if either, approach (C or remap) would eventually > be able to work with cutter compensation turned on. For most lathe > tool shapes it's necessary to use compensation whenever you have an > arc or even a straight feature that's not parallel to an axis.
in case a recursive call of the interpreter is used to execute the generated moves then I think that those two issues - cycle and compensation - are ships in the night - not aware of each other, so I guess it would work -m > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Live Security Virtual Conference > Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and > threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions > will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware > threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ > _______________________________________________ > Emc-users mailing list > Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
