Hi people. First of all I'm agreed with Steve Blackmore .
Yesterday I joined the IRC meeting and I don't know if there was a misunderstanding about the GMT time meeting but for the first 15-20 and maybe more minutes the discussion was a "free chatting" without any real concrete object . So I left . A do believe that before a meeting the points that have to be discussed should be clearly pointed out and the users should be previously informed about as much as possible via mailing list and LinuxCNC official forum or wiki page . I would like to have the possibility to suggest one or more items on a public wish list and that public wish list should be a place where the various items can be voted from the user/developers so the board of people that are on the top of the LinuxCNC hierarchy (devel people) should evaluate the feasibility and priority due to the actual development . I do believe that now LinuxCNC is at an historical turning point and I hope that this opportunity will be catch. Realistically it's not possible to satisfy the everybody wishes but I hope that the decisions that the board will take will be the most pragmatic as possible due to an organic and scalable development. Alex On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 9:46 AM, Dave Caroline <dave.thearchiv...@gmail.com>wrote: > On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 8:38 AM, Steve Blackmore <st...@pilotltd.net> > wrote: > > On Sat, 29 Jun 2013 20:29:32 -0600, you wrote: > > > >>Today we held the first IRC meeting! > > > > Unfortunately during work time for me! > > > >>The full transcript is here: http://meetlog.archivist.info/ > > > > Tried to read it - but the colour scheme is unsuitable for my old eyes. > > Yellow on Mustard just doesn't work - I gave up before it gave me > > migraine but did pick up on some interesting points and personality > > traits :) > > try this http://meetlog.archivist.info/meeting.php?id=201306 > > Dave Caroline > > > > > Got more from the Meeting2013 wiki entry > > > > A few comments > > > > The whole concept is flawed. Unless you can "attend" at that particular > > time, you have no say whatsoever - just like the existing management > > committee those there can do as they choose. > > > > Disband the Management Committee - definitely > > Replace it with this format "agreed" yesterday - definitely not. > > > > Obvious from the "agreed" items that the old "Board of Directors" still > > rule the roost as the only subject of any real merit was not discussed! > > > > Steve Blackmore > > -- > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: > > > > Build for Windows Store. > > > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev > > _______________________________________________ > > Emc-users mailing list > > Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: > > Build for Windows Store. > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Emc-users mailing list > Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
