Bruce Layne wrote: > > I don't understand the desire to have an online distributed realtime > discussion. IRC seems like a good way for a few people to discuss a > topic, or one person to pose a technical question to a few others, but a > bad way to run a meeting of 20+ people. I think a much better solution > would be a discussion that occurs over a few days, where people from all > time zones can reply thoughtfully, at their leisure, and everyone can > take a few minutes to think about the various suggestions. I really agree with you, here. These IRC chats are very hard to follow (and due to some confusion on the time, I missed the last one, DARN!) One advantage of the IRC is there is a real-time log of everything said, however hard it is to read. There is, of course, a log of mailing list comments as well.
Jon ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
