On Tuesday 11 August 2015 02:48:53 Dave Caroline wrote:

> It also depends on minimum tap size, a tiny tap will be less able to
> stand any vertical strain due to encoder resolution in thou per
> encoder edge and there has to be an amount due to the turn around of
> up to something (a count) plus any delay in the software and servo
> driver lags (ferror)

I haven't broken a tap (yet). Because the lock between spindle and 
carriage is beyond my weak drive, even a drive failure from spinning the 
teeth off the lower drive pulley has only resulted in a howling drive as 
the PID pours on even more coal.  So, I kill the spindle power and 
finish the job by hand using the chuck key as a handle.  The carriage 
dutifully follows my motion applied to the chuck until I can either have 
the tap free, or in one event, I hand pecked it for about 10 minutes and 
finished the job, then backed it out of the hole, intact.

Where I get in trouble is on a bigger tap that isn't chucked tightly 
enough to prevent its turning in the drill chuck mounted to the 
toolpost.  That slippage will get it out of time & put some strain on 
things, best to loosen the chuck, back it away, pull it off the QC and 
use a tap wrench to extract it from the unfinished hole.

> Rather machine dependent(and its settings) and I doubt anyone can
> write a general specification.

I can't argue that point. Each machine is its own best judge.  With a 50 
cycle wheel on the lathe, direction reversals are not a problem as they 
are detected instantly. At what point a lessor count in the wheel would 
become a problem I don't know.  An 8 slot wheel feeding an ABX encoder 
might work surprisingly well.

> I wonder if the tap makers have any numbers for machine taps.
>
> Dave Caroline
>
> On 11/08/2015, Jon Elson <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On 08/10/2015 06:38 PM, David Bagby wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >> I'm planning a mill conversion to LCNC and I'd like it to be able
> >> to do rigid tapping.
> >>
> >> I figure that this will require an encoder or equivalent) on the
> >> spindle. I won't be able to to easily attach a common encoder disc
> >> to the spindle, so I will probably have to create an encoder (which
> >> appears easier than doing a remote encoder driven via a belt etc).
> >>
> >> I've looked but not found a spec for the required encoder
> >> resolution. Does anyone have advice as to min spindle encoder
> >> resolution (ppr) required?
> >> Has anyone gotten by with 8 or 12 pulses (32 or 48 quadrature) ?
> >
> > I've been doing it using the 81 tooth bull gear on my
> > Bridgeport 1J head, and that works fine.  That comes out to
> > 324 quadrature counts/rev.  I'd guess that your counts will
> > likely work OK, too. You can figure out the steps/second the
> > encoder value will show. For instance, at 100 RPM, the
> > spindle will be turning 1.667 RPS, and 32 counts/rev will
> > give 32 * 1.667 = 53.33 increments/second to the encoder
> > value. Most machine controls don't have the bandwidth to
> > keep up with that, and will just average over it.
> >
> > The worst situation would be that this would feed a
> > stairstep position to the PID (assuming a servo Z axis) and
> > that the PID + drive combination would have some resonance
> > at certain frequencies that could be excited by the stairstep.
> >
> > Jon
> >
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> >---------- _______________________________________________
> > Emc-users mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>-------- _______________________________________________
> Emc-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Cheers, Gene Heskett
-- 
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to