It doesnt sound like the task is well defined here on mail list. If the 2 independent(?) systems do not require interpolation _between_ them, then M65 thru M66 could provide the 'handshaking'. Each would have a 'busy' and a 'fin' signal. This is extremely sequential.
Else please explain more, and what did you see happen when ~"it didnt seem ready to accept commands" ? TomP tjtr33 On 09/24/2015 03:00 AM, Gregg Eshelman wrote: > On 9/24/2015 12:57 AM, Dave Caroline wrote: >> might be better to let the two talk to each other in some way so move >> starts/runs are really synchronised properly rather than rely on >> buffers. >> eg classic ladder or some clocking or whatever >> >> Dave Caroline > > That sounds good. What you Do Not Want is a race condition where you > have two or more independent parallel processes with nothing to ensure > they always complete in the correct order. > > For an example of what can happen, google Therac 25 > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Monitor Your Dynamic Infrastructure at Any Scale With Datadog! Get real-time metrics from all of your servers, apps and tools in one place. SourceForge users - Click here to start your Free Trial of Datadog now! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=241902991&iu=/4140 _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
