>2015-11-17 22:23 GMT+02:00 Marius Liebenberg <mar...@mastercut.co.za>: >>>Why not to treat the chuck motor as another joint of X axis? There >>>already are 2 of them (on the gantry), so adding 3rd should be >>>straightforward - that allows homing the chuck to its own switch >>>without any additional hassle in HAL or whatever. >>> >> I probably dont have an idea of how that works. I am not good with >> joints mode. > >You already have 2 joints assigned to X axis on the gantry. Or am I >missing something? So I think that adding 3d joint to the same X axis >in HAL should be trivial. > No I am using trivial kinematics so there is only one joint for X axis. The other side is slaved. So not running in joint mode. I found that trivial kinematics is better for gantry systems.
>Viesturs > >------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >_______________________________________________ >Emc-users mailing list >Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
