On 16/02/16 12:26, Bertho Stultiens wrote:
>> The alternatives seem to have the same problems of repeatability. Using
>> > a hall sensor or optical one will give the same problems. Micro-switches
>> > are at least inherently mechanically constrained.
> Indeed, unless you can crush them. There must be a run-into-the-wall
> protection, as mentioned earlier, to prevent killing your switch.

The problem on the Taig is while one hits the end stop one end, you come
out of the nut the other ;) But while stalling the motors looses
position, it's not a particular problem from the safety point of view.
Unless you put a finger in the way ...

I've been looking to fit slotted sensors as limit switches to prevent
problems at both ends of the table, with a flag on the bed which goes
through the sensor (so no crush problem), and this is fine for limiting
things, but it's repeatability is somewhat suspect for use as a home
position. I was seeing 0.1mm drift depending on various factors, but not
being desperate for it I did not investigate further.

-- 
Lester Caine - G8HFL
-----------------------------
Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact
L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk
EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/
Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk
Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to