It doesn't answer your question but have you considered using thread forming
taps? Certainly no gullets to fill!

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gene Heskett [mailto:ghesk...@shentel.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2017 4:57 PM
> To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
> Subject: [Emc-users] Question on Z backlash vs rigid tapping
>
> Greetings everybody;
>
> One of the things I have noted recently was a correlation between the
thread
> fit, and a commercial bolt screwed into the hole, and I believe it has to
do with
> my use of a peck routine to do the tapping, more pecks=sloppier fit.
>
> My spindle doesn't have enough power to drive a 10mm tap in one pass, nor
> do I feel comfortable when the gullets of the tap get filled, so I peck at
it so I
> can clean and add a drop or 2 of buttercutt or rapidtap as I program a 3
to 4
> second pause at the top of the travel to give me time to do that.
>
> Doing some 8mm holes in 3" pipe walls, I drove it about as hard as the
spindle
> could manage to keep turning, so I drove it deep enough into the hole per
pass
> that it only took 6 passes to get the last of the taps taper out of the
bottom of
> the hole.
>
> The backlash fly in this soup is the filter I've put in the encoder path
to average
> the  level of the last 4 edges out of the encoder, which works well for
that and
> allows lots more Pgain to be used. That represents a fixed number of
spindle
> degrees of lag, which of course causes the rigid tap to not follow the z
motion
> perfectly.
>
> I have considered adding additional backlash comp, but the required amount
> would change with the tpi, so while that would help, its not a perfect fix
since
> there is not a way to change it dynamically.
>
> I could take the filter out, but I'd have to reduce Pgain by at least 75%
just to
> keep it from hammering the gears in the head from the perceived errors in
the
> velocity signal caused by a 5% quadrature timing error wobble in a 4 step
> repeatable sequence.
>
> This is not an error the PID's can even see, let alone try to correct.
>
> Is it time to junk the optical encoder, and install a thin steel gear in
its place,
> and machine some sliding mounts for at least two of the 3 ats667's so that
> finer adjustments to reduce the quadrature noise can be done? I have bent
> and otherwise adjusted the opto-interrupters until there is no further
> improvements to be had.
>
> In which case, where might I be able to source a 30-60 tooth gear that is
> precisely enough made, is not more than 2.25" in diameter, and only 1/16"
> thick?
>
> The current optical setup gives me 268 edges per rev. 67 slots in the
disk.
> Mechanical errors in carving the disk would be reduced percentagewise by
> applying the error to fewer slots, but that seems counter-productive for
rigid
> tapping.
>
> What say you folks?
>
> Thanks all.
>
> Cheers, Gene Heskett
> --
> "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
>  soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
> -Ed Howdershelt (Author)
> Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene>
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging
> tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> Emc-users mailing list
> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to