Hi Chris,
> Yes I use Fusion but the last Windows I used was Windows 95.   I use
Fusion
> on a Mac.
Ah,  I didn't realize it was also available for the MAC.

> > For CAM the Fusion360 generated STL files can be changed to G-Code by
> Cura
> > or Repetier for your 3D printer.
> >
> 
> Yes.  I user Cura on the Mac.  then literally walk the SD card from the
Mac
> to the printer.    Going to change that so the printer can pull files from
> a Synology NAS server.  This means adding a Raspberry Pi to the printer.
> Will at the sometime add a web-cam to the printer so I can check progress
> using my iPhone.  Some printer can take 6 or even 8 hours.
> 
I am very pleased with Octopi and a Raspberry Pi2 with USB WiFi dongle.  It
sits in another room with the printer and the camera on the Pi lets me watch
what is going on.

> > For CAM and LinuxCNC (I'm assuming since you are on this list you use
> > LinuxCNC) does Fusion360 generate the G-Code?  Or is there something
else
> > inbetween.
> > 
> Fusion can generate g-code for lathes and mills up to 5-axis.  It gives
> pretty good control of the tool path. there are lots or parameters and you
> change them and can see how it changes the path.
> 
Cool.  Didn't know that.  I've found the MecSoft CAM software is easy to
use.  Both stand alone and also the AlibreCAM version.  Not cheap though. I
have the 4 axis version in anticipation for working with my new 4th axis
harmonic drive.

> You sometimes also write G-Code directly.
> >
> 
> No.  I cut and past a few lines of boiler plat now and then.   The problem
> with wring-code is that it is machine specific.

Only occasionally.  One instance was drilling 16 holes in a plastic panel
for a DIN rail box.  Special jig to hold the panel.  Press go.  Drill holes.
Remove panel. Blow away plastic. Insert new Panel. Repeat.  Easier I think
than using a CAM program.
> 
> Almost.  What I want and am looking for is a kind of conversational system
> where I can walk up to the mill and use it for something simple with no
> need for g-code.   I'm going back and forth on what would be best.  But my
> first try will be a hand held box with a control wheel and an LCD screen
> and so buttons.   It can completely by-pass LCNC

You're describing a Mill version of my Electronic Lead Screw.  That was one
of the reasons I was looking more closely at the BeagleBone MachineKit.
Benefits of full LinuxCNC when needed but also the MPG, buttons and display
for manual control.  My ELS uses a parallel port connector that with a
printer port switch can move between a PC running CNC software and the ELS
which has a more manual lathe control interface.   One day I may get there.

For the last couple of years I've had my ELS running the Knee on the mill.
Essentially a power feed but with a return to home button I can move it down
out of the way and then just return it to where it was automatically.  
> 
Still looking forward to getting the mill fully CNC>

John

> 
> >
> > --
> 
> Chris Albertson
> Redondo Beach, California
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> Emc-users mailing list
> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to