Measure your filament at several different spots with calipers and make sure 
that the “filiment size” setting In the slicer matches your measurement exactly.

> On Jun 2, 2020, at 4:57 PM, Gene Heskett <ghesk...@shentel.net> wrote:
> 
> On Tuesday 02 June 2020 16:37:08 Chris Albertson wrote:
> 
>> I just printed a set of 3mm pitch GT3 timing pulleys with my 0.4 mm
>> nozzle. They came out just fine.
>> 
>> The final profile of the pulley tooth is not determined by the
>> nozzle diameter it is limited by the step size on the printer.   My
>> pulley fit the belt well enough that tooth shape is not the limiting
>> factor.    On my case it is runout, not tooth shape that will cause
>> the greatest error.
>> 
>> Think of an end mill cutter.  I can make sharp corners with a 12mm
>> diameter end mill.   What I can't do is make less then a 6mm inside
>> radius.  Same with the nozzle but backwards.  A 0.4mm roud nozzle can
>> make at best a 0.2 radiu corner while the 0.2 nozzle can print a 0.1mm
>> radius.  But the printer steps are that size and introduce a larger
>> error than the nozzle. In any case what you really care about is error
>> in motion transfer between the pulleys.   Runout matters but a tiny
>> radius error on an outside corner does not change how the belt sits in
>> the pulley.
>> 
>> There is a big disadvantage to 0.2 nozzles  (1) they clog up and need
>> cleaning and (2) printing is about a lot slower.
>> 
>> Your first step before printing pulleys is to print a cube.  Use CAD
>> software so you know the exact dimension you specified, run it trough
>> the slicer, print and measure all sides and angles.   Get those
>> measurements good enough.
>> 
>> When designing with plastic, you have to make stuff bigger.  Use the
>> largest pulleys that will physically fit and this keeps the percent
>> error down.
>> 
>> I any case my A6 primer is the same as your Ender except mine uses
>> ground steel rods for track and yours uses extrusions, But everything
>> else is the same all down to the Merlin firmware.   My 3mm pitch by
>> 9mm wide GT3 profile pulleys came out pretty good.      I had to make
>> the flanges wider as the aluminum pulley design has tapered flanges
>> that came to a point.  I made them thicker and blunter and used a 20mm
>> center bore.     Odd that I could print the tooth profile just fine
>> but not the flanges.
>> 
> I'm about 90% done with a 10 tooth XL, and not at all impressed by the 
> actual tooth profile as it has lots of voids.  Supposed to have a top 
> flange, but its not gotten there yet.  The bottom was supposed to be 
> about 10mm thick so the captured nut would have lots of meat around it, 
> but its not sitting flat on the bed, came loose in the first mm and the 
> hub section is way thin, guessing 6mm is all.  Cuda had a profile for an 
> ender 3 pro, but this isn't showing me its optimum. Done.  Looks like an 
> XL belt will fit, the flange looks usable.  Had to dig out the nut 
> pocket as it had the first layer laydown across it, but I've no clue 
> where I might find a nut that small. Even the base hub is semi 
> transparent like the PLA feed was too slow to fill 100%, I can hold it 
> up in front of the monitor, shade it from the overhead lights and see 
> flashes of light coming thru between the strings in the nominally 6mm 
> thick base hub. I wouldn't call that more than 25% filled.  And the 
> teeth are edgy enough to affect the service life of the belt.
> 
> So, redo it for a 10mm thick hub, and turn up the extruder feed to get 
> better fill?  Or reduce the xy feed rate, giving the pla a better chance 
> to fill? Which stands the best chance to getting something usable on the 
> next pass?  Then I need to make a bigger one, 28 or 32 teeth. To serve 
> as the Z drive on the Sheldon, first match the current tooth count just 
> to see if a 3NM motor is froggy enough.. Mainly because I have spare 
> belts for the existing rig.  What I have obtained is a nema 34 to nema 
> 23 adapter, and that won't change the belts tooth count since the motor 
> shaft won't move laterally.
> 
> Stay safe and well & thanks Chris.
> 
> Gene
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Emc-users mailing list
> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to